Dear Sunrise Sub Team members, By the beginning of the Sunrise Sub Team meeting on Wednesday, 17 April at 18:00 UTC, the Sub Team is tasked to complete: 1. Reviewing Agreed Sunrise Charter Question 3, in conjunction with Individual Proposal #10; 2. Reviewing Agreed Sunrise Charter Question 4, in conjunction with Individual Proposal #11; 3. Reviewing Agreed Sunrise Charter Question 1, in conjunction with Individual Proposal #9; 4. Reviewing Agreed Sunrise Charter Question 5(a). Resources NOTE: Staff have been informed that there are temporary tech issues with the community wiki, so please use the attachments for now. Summary Table (draft as of 08 March 2019): It contains all Agreed Sunrise Charter Questions, as well as the reference to and summary of all data gathered to assist answering these questions. Regarding the most updated version that contains the draft preliminary recommendations that staff have already encapsulated, Sub Team Co-Chairs will discuss with staff about the best approach and timing to circulate them to facilitate the Sub Team’s review. We will keep the Sub Team posted. * Question 1: pp.8-11 * Question 3: pp.13-15 * Question 4: pp.15-18 * Question 5(a): pp.18-20 Relevant to the Agreed Sunrise Charter Questions, multiple individual proposals were submitted. Initial staff analysis concluded the following Individual Proposals are more relevant to the Agreed Sunrise Charter Questions being reviewed by the Sub Team in the homework assignment: * Individual Proposal #9 (Q1) * Individual Proposal #10 (Q3) * Individual Proposal #11 (Q4) Intended Scope of Work for the Upcoming Meeting According to the current workplan, during the Sunrise Sub Team meeting on Wednesday, 17 April, the Sub Team is expected to have completed the preliminary recommendations for Questions 3 and 4, as well as the review of Individual Proposals #10 and #11. If the Sub Team progresses faster than expected and if time permits, the Sub Team can also proceed with developing preliminary recommendations for Questions 1 and 5(a), as well as the review of Individual Proposal #9. Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel