Quick note to the subgroup that I believe we are operating far beyond our scope, and far beyond our timeframe. David, could you kindly recirculate our document of the publicly-available data and the report generated by you and Mary? Tx, Kathy On 9/16/2016 10:12 AM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
I'm sorry Kurt, but I have to object. I appreciate the work, but I don't understand the difference between the four documents I am looking at and I don't have time to cross-compare. I will have to revert back to the last version circulated by Staff.
Best, Kathy
On 9/15/2016 9:17 PM, kurt@kjpritz.com wrote:
Hi Everyone: Attached are several forms of the questions for registry operators, registrars, et.al. that has been augmented with the questions developed by Susan and Kristine after their review of the charter. This might be overkill, but I am sending the question list in three forms:
* redlines to the last version of the question list that show: o new questions from the charter review, o a few question that were deleted where the group voiced concern, o a few grammatical edits o new comments * a version with those redlines accepted but comments remaining * a clean version.
During the meeting, I recommend we can use the version with redlines accepted but with comments as they can form the basis of our discussion. I also included a stand-alone list of the questions that were developed from the review of the charter so that you can see the sources of the new questions. I hope you find this helpful. Thank you Susan and Kristine. Regards, Kurt
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list Gnso-rpm-tmch@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list Gnso-rpm-tmch@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch