With the greatest of respect Kathy, we are not at all outside of scope. This is what was agreed on the last call that we would do. We discussed last week the work Kristine and I had done looking at the charter question specifically to try to identify where they gave rise additional questions that we should ask the various groups - registries, registrars, DPML providers and the TMCH. As agreed on the call, Kristine, Kurt and I then revisited this during the course of this week to tidy-up those additional questions and add them to the list of questions this group was already working on (making sure not to duplicate something already there). That is the document Kurt has circulated. As he said, it is probably easier for everyone to read the clean copy with the comments rather than the composite redline (which gets very busy), but either could be used. The fourth document - the charter questions themselves with the questions they gave rise to - is only there so that anyone who wants transparency of our process can have it, we don't need to look at this if you do not want to. Susan Payne Head of Legal Policy | Valideus Ltd E: susan.payne@valideus.com<mailto:susan.payne@valideus.com> D: +44 20 7421 8255 T: +44 20 7421 8299 M: +44 7971 661175 Please note I will be on holiday from 19 September, returning 3 October 2016 From: gnso-rpm-tmch-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-tmch-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman Sent: 16 September 2016 15:15 To: gnso-rpm-tmch@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-tmch] Revised Questions Listing Quick note to the subgroup that I believe we are operating far beyond our scope, and far beyond our timeframe. David, could you kindly recirculate our document of the publicly-available data and the report generated by you and Mary? Tx, Kathy On 9/16/2016 10:12 AM, Kathy Kleiman wrote: I'm sorry Kurt, but I have to object. I appreciate the work, but I don't understand the difference between the four documents I am looking at and I don't have time to cross-compare. I will have to revert back to the last version circulated by Staff. Best, Kathy On 9/15/2016 9:17 PM, kurt@kjpritz.com<mailto:kurt@kjpritz.com> wrote: Hi Everyone: Attached are several forms of the questions for registry operators, registrars, et.al. that has been augmented with the questions developed by Susan and Kristine after their review of the charter. This might be overkill, but I am sending the question list in three forms: * redlines to the last version of the question list that show: * new questions from the charter review, * a few question that were deleted where the group voiced concern, * a few grammatical edits * new comments * a version with those redlines accepted but comments remaining * a clean version. During the meeting, I recommend we can use the version with redlines accepted but with comments as they can form the basis of our discussion. I also included a stand-alone list of the questions that were developed from the review of the charter so that you can see the sources of the new questions. I hope you find this helpful. Thank you Susan and Kristine. Regards, Kurt _______________________________________________ Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list Gnso-rpm-tmch@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rpm-tmch@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch _______________________________________________ Gnso-rpm-tmch mailing list Gnso-rpm-tmch@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rpm-tmch@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-tmch