Dear All Please find below the notes and actions from today’s RPMs TMCH sub-team call. 1. The meeting began with a review of the questions being sent by the Analysis group to the TMCH providers. An additional question suggested: What is the "base-line" abandonment rate? 2. A review of the feedback from received from Registrars to the sub-team’s questions took place. The following amendments were suggested: Q1 stop at "displayed". Q2 - 4 remove term "cart" and revise to "what is the rate of attempted registration abandonment" Q Re: TM+50, add general question at the end and remove specific question The following actions we agreed: · Staff to share questions with Analysis Group · Staff to review transcript for proposed revisions to questions to registrars. · Consider geting TMCH data on their clients registering in new gTLDs (to factor into possibility that a TM owner may be buying their own name, and getting a claims notice - Susan P to check if TMCH clients buying their own name get a notice at all, or if that depends on which registrar they use) · Add question for Providers re: Compare reg TMCH entries vs. the TMCH +50 designations · Staff to review registrar questions regarding TM+50 to fold in conclusion of discussions · ST to provide further suggestions on sunrise questions. Add 'or if you have no data please [insert SB proposed redraft] Kind regards, David A. Tait Policy Specialist (Solicitor qualified in Scotland) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Mobile: + 44-7864-793776 Email: david.tait@icann.org www.icann.org