P.P.S. Here's a sample of some articles I found in about 30 minutes of research. I would pay close attention to John Berryhill's comments to the first link -- some very eye-opening and startling insights. Why wasn't John Berryhill invited to share those insights with this PDP, to answer questions, and counter what INTA presented and to achieve balance? Why should anyone have to fill out a form, when INTA didn't? http://domainincite.com/16492-how-one-guy-games-new-gtld-sunrise-periods https://onlinedomain.com/2014/04/15/legal/fake-trademarks-stealing-generic-d... https://www.thedomains.com/2017/02/01/the-trademark-clearinghouse-worked-so-... https://www.thedomains.com/2015/03/12/is-the-trademark-clearinghouse-causing... https://www.internetcommerce.org/tmchnew-gtld-registrations/ https://domainnamewire.com/2014/02/10/how-common-words-like-pizza-money-and-... https://domainnamewire.com/2014/01/31/donuts-sunrise-data/ https://domainnamewire.com/2014/03/25/tmch-brag/ https://domainnamewire.com/2014/01/30/the-numbers-are-in-donuts-sunrises-typ... Since ICANN staff had more than a year, much more than the 30 minutes I used to find the above articles, perhaps they will take 2 minutes and simply copy/paste the results of their own research to the mailing list. While they abandoned their efforts, they surely must have compiled some data or set of links into a document/spreadsheet somewhere. No need to make it "pretty" or add to it --- ICANN staff should share just what they currently have (assuming it exists), so that members aren't starting from scratch, but can rather build upon what ICANN staff abandoned. Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/