Dear all, Not having received any further feedback, including on the additional suggestions of examples for Deloitte, staff would like to suggest that we go ahead and send what we have to Deloitte so that they will have at least an initial list of follow up questions and examples first thing Monday morning. However, we will be sure to note that there may be additional or supplemental questions and/or examples to come. We are also pleased to inform everyone that Vicky Folens from Deloitte has confirmed that she will be in Copenhagen and able to join our Working Group for our Saturday 11 March face-to-face meeting. Staff is working with the Co-Chairs to finalize an agenda for that meeting as well as our open community session on Wednesday 15 March, based on the proposed agendas that were circulated for your feedback after our call this past Wednesday. Please let us know if you have any additional comments. Thanks and cheers Mary On 3/2/17, 11:26, "Mary Wong" <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote: Thanks much, George – I apologize that I had omitted to ask Working Group members if they support inclusion of the three additional examples you’d suggested. All, please chime in with your thoughts as soon as you can. Thank you! Cheers Mary On 3/2/17, 05:41, "George Kirikos" <icann@leap.com> wrote: For the list of example marks in Annex A, (there are only 3 at present, namely CARS, PARENTS and FRUIT OF THE LOOM), I had thought we were also going to include the 3 additional ones at: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2017-February/001064.html namely for "MUSIC", "DEALHUNTER" and the stylized letter 'A' ?? When the the topic originally came up, I think we had wanted to get at least 5 examples (so this would make a total of 6). Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.leap.com_&d=DwIFaQ&c... On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote: > Dear all, > > > > Please find attached a compilation of all the questions that the Working > Group has agreed to send to Deloitte for follow up and additional feedback. > As mentioned on the call earlier today, we are hoping to send out the list > by the end of this week, to allow Deloitte a chance to review the list > before meeting with us at ICANN58 in Copenhagen. We will therefore greatly > appreciate it if you can let us know if you see any omissions, inaccuracies > or mistakes that need correction in the attached document by 1200 UTC this > Friday, 3 March 2017. > > > > Please note the following as well: > > > > · As noted on the call today, it is unlikely that Deloitte will be > able to provide answers to the questions in time for our meetings at > ICANN58; however, we hope that sending them the list before then will allow > for a constructive discussion at ICANN58. > > > > · The attached list does not include the following questions that > were also suggested: > > > > “Ask Deloitte for a list of all TMCH registrations with Sunrise preference > and to indicate which are dictionary terms” – staff is uncertain what this > question is aimed to elicit, and we are also concerned that Deloitte may not > wish to provide specific lists or engage on the question of what are, and > are not, dictionary terms. We therefore suggest rephrasing this question if > it is still deemed to be needed. > > > > “Ask Deloitte if a separate SMD file is created for each additional > Previously-Abused Label that is added” – in view of the fact that these > labels are not used for Sunrise registrations but only to generate Claims > Notices, we would like to ask if this question is still needed. > > > > Thanks and cheers > > Mary > > > _______________________________________________ > gnso-rpm-wg mailing list > gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg