Georges: Not responding to every point, because our mutual positions are clear, however: On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Nahitchevansky, Georges <ghn@kilpatricktownsend.com> wrote:
George K
The INTA survey, which you obviously loathe because it actually detracts from your narrative, is far more useful in analyzing the RPMs for domain names. But I understand that anything that might show why the RPMs are helpful or useful will always be flawed in your view.
That's not true at all. It's simply a poorly done survey, period, with results that are statistically invalid, due to the small sample size and other reasons that were previously discussed. Had they done a proper survey, the results would be much harder to challenge, and could stand up to scrutiny. A survey of 33, that is also not representative? That's laughable (and I showed the court precedents that laughed along with me at that kind of study). Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/