George, Thanks for the update. This is noted. Best, Julie On 10/12/18, 9:44 AM, "George Kirikos" <icann@leap.com> wrote: I'll have a revised version of URS Proposal #12 available sometime next week (with many thanks to Rebecca for her insights), but will be unable to have it ready before today's call (I only presented that proposal 2 days ago, and it'll take me a little longer to revise it, and double-check it with Rebecca). Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.leap.com_&d=DwIFaQ&c... On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> wrote: > Dear RPM PDP Working Group members, > > > > On behalf of the Co-Chairs, please see the draft agenda below for the > Working Group meeting on Friday, 12 October at 1700 UTC for 120 minutes > (meeting may not require the full 120 minutes). > > > > Per Co-Chairs’ Proposed Procedure, for this next meeting, the Working Group > will continue discussion of the Individual URS Proposals. According to the > timeline published on the wiki the order of the presentation is as follows. > WG members are requested to review the presentations prior to Wednesday’s > meeting. > > > > George Kirikos (#23): > https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/93126760/URS-Proposal-23.pd... > George Kirikos (#32): > https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/93126760/URS-Proposal-32.pd... > George Kirikos (#33): > https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/93126760/URS-Proposal-33.pd... > George Kirikos and Zak Muscovitch (#34): > https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/93126760/URS-Proposal-34.pd... > > > > NOTE FOR WG MEMBERS REVISING PROPOSALS: If WG members have revised/combined > proposals the Co-Chairs request that they send them to the WG list as soon > as possible and be ready to present them during the meeting on Friday, 12 > October. > > > > Staff have updated the numberings displayed on the proposals to be > consistent with the numberings on the wiki. The wiki page also includes a > document that consolidates all URS proposals from individual members to > facilitate viewing/reference. > > > > Per the procedure, please also note the following time requirements for the > presentations: > > > > When a proposal is up for discussion, its proponent will be accorded a > maximum of five (5) minutes to orally present the proposal, rationale, and > supporting evidence. > The floor will then be open to other Working Group members to comment on the > proposal for a maximum of two (2) minutes each, with total discussion > limited to twenty (20) minutes. However, if there is exceptionally high > interest in a topic, the Co-Chairs would have discretion to increase the > discussion time. > At the end of twenty (20) minutes, or when there are no more commenters in > queue, the proponent will have up to four (4) minutes to respond and/or > propose a modification of the proposal based upon the discussion. > > > > Depending on the actual progress during the Wednesday meeting, if a proposal > cannot be presented due to time limitation, the presentation should be > deferred to the meeting on 12 October. > > > > Draft Agenda: > > Review Agenda/Statements of Interest Updates > Discussion of Individual URS Proposals (See: wiki) > ICANN63 Schedule (see attached) > AOB > > > > Best, > > Mary, Ariel, Berry, and Julie > > On Behalf of the RPM PDP WG Co-Chairs > > > _______________________________________________ > gnso-rpm-wg mailing list > gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg