Thanks for circulating George, but that is not a task for this WG. I think we have plenty to do without doing research for research's sake because it might be "educational". A whole host of factors play into whether, and the extent to which, a brand is likely to be a target for cybersquatting and into whether, and the extent to which, that brand might decide to utilise the URS, UDRP, Court, defensive registrations, or whatever other avenues it considers most relevant and appropriate. Susan Payne Head of Legal Policy Valideus 28-30 Little Russell Street London WC1A 2HN United Kingdom E: susan.payne@valideus.com www.valideus.com -----Original Message----- From: gnso-rpm-wg [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of George Kirikos Sent: 04 October 2018 14:17 To: gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] Interbrand's 2018 list of the most valuable brands Hi folks, Interbrand just released its 2018 ranking of the world's most valuable brands, see: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/oct/04/apple-google-and-amazon-n... https://www.interbrand.com/best-brands/best-global-brands/2018/ranking/#?lis... It might be educational to compare that list with the list of most frequent complainants in the URS (and down the road, the UDRP). [It could also be useful for the TMCH work.] Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg