Hello Maxim, Thank you for the very helpful clarification. I’ll amend the notes accordingly. Kind regards, Julie From: Maxim Alzoba <m.alzoba@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, October 12, 2017 at 3:10 AM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Cc: "gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Action Items from 11 October Working Group Call Hello Julie, I think -- revise the minimal End Day Sunrise period to 67 days (additional 60 days) in Chart 5 should be " -- revise the End Date Sunrise periods to +60 days (additional 60 days) *in Chart 5 " with the footnote: *in the End Date Sunrise the prevailing party (when two or more parties applied for the same domain name) is decided by the end of the period, which can not be less than 60 days, so the period when parties can apply for the domain name is at least 60 days. If more than one party applied for the domain name, then the winner decided according to the policies and procedures of the TLD (such as auction e.t.c.). and additional footnote for Start Date Sunrise: in the Start Date Sunrise, Registry provides notification of such period in 30 days in advance, so the period when parties can start applying for the domain name starts in no less than 30 days after such a notification, the party applied first might have the domain registered for them (subject to the polices of the TLD, such as additional qualifications e.t.c.). I think it might allow the reader of the text to understand that 30 days from notification were actually part of the awareness period. Sincerely Yours, Maxim Alzoba Special projects manager, International Relations Department, FAITID m. +7 916 6761580(+whatsapp) skype oldfrogger Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow) On Oct 12, 2017, at 01:20, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> wrote: Dear all, The action items noted by staff from the Working Group call held today, Wednesday, 11 October, are as follows: 1. Staff Compilation of Sunrise Data: -- WG to consider and to provide feedback to staff: Is the data helpful and is there a different way (or additional ways) it should be presented that would be more helpful? Are there other types of data on Sunrise that you were expecting that staff can provide (assuming the existing sources used by staff contain that data)? Staff action items (Berry Cobb): -- add page number to the data presentation document -- consider removing the spec13 sunrise information as it has no meaning (Chart 3) -- find out whether Donuts opted in all its 238 TLDs for End Date Sunrise (Kathy Kleiman's question) -- consider using scatter diagram for Chart 3 to identify mean and median -- revise the minimal End Day Sunrise period to 67 days (additional 60 days) in Chart 5 -- consider adding variables and correlations for Chart 7-8, including types of registration, number of registration, lengths of sunrise period, etc. Draw data from the column format or add to spreadsheet (Attachment 2) 2. Next Steps/Next Meeting: -- Staff to circulate to the mailing list of times/dates of the RPMs sessions at ICANN60, including remote participation details; in the next RPMs meeting on 18 Oct, preparation for ICANN60 sessions likely to be the main discussion item, including chairing logistics The notes from the call will be posted shortly to the Working Group wiki space, together with the call recording, transcript and Adobe Connect chat and attendance records. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg