Hi all, We will not be in a position to present on today’s call, but I wanted to let you know that our group (Winterfeldt et al.) and Marie Pattullo from AIM have agreed to merge certain proposals that are co-extensive, namely: * Proposals #21 (AIM) and #22 (Winterfeldt et al.) * Proposals #17 (AIM) and #16 (Winterfeldt et al.) · Proposals #14 (AIM) and #15 (Winterfeldt et al.) David McAuley and our group have also agreed to work together to try and consolidate our similar proposals concerning the post-default de novo review period (#9 (D. McAuley) and #10 (Winterfeldt et al.)). Again, nothing ready to present today though. We hope to circulate merged versions of these proposals soon. Best regards, Griffin ________________________________ [https://daks2k3a4ib2z.cloudfront.net/59358b8cf7332631232417e8/595fb59d73c5b113a1d2a61b_WIPG_LogoMark.png]<https://www.winterfeldt.law/> Griffin M. Barnett Associate Winterfeldt IP Group 1200 17<x-apple-data-detectors://12/1>th<x-apple-data-detectors://12/1> St NW<x-apple-data-detectors://12/1>, Ste 501<x-apple-data-detectors://12/1> Washington, DC 20036<x-apple-data-detectors://12/1> griffin@winterfeldt.law<mailto:griffin@winterfeldt.law> +1 202 759 5836 From: gnso-rpm-wg [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Corwin, Philip via gnso-rpm-wg Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 10:42 AM To: julie.hedlund@icann.org; gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] REMINDER: Agenda and Materials for 12 October Working Group Meeting 1700 UTC I’ll be chairing today’s call. Does any WG member plan to present a revised proposal on the call after we get through George’s remaining four? Thank you and talk with many of you soon. Philip S. Corwin Policy Counsel VeriSign, Inc. 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 703-948-4648/Direct 571-342-7489/Cell "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey From: gnso-rpm-wg [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 9:16 AM To: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [gnso-rpm-wg] REMINDER: Agenda and Materials for 12 October Working Group Meeting 1700 UTC Dear RPM PDP Working Group members, On behalf of the Co-Chairs, please see the draft agenda below for the Working Group meeting on Friday, 12 October at 1700 UTC for 120 minutes (meeting may not require the full 120 minutes). Per Co-Chairs’ Proposed Procedure<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/93126760/Co-Chairs%20Propos...>, for this next meeting, the Working Group will continue discussion of the Individual URS Proposals. According to the timeline published on the wiki<https://community.icann.org/x/aACNBQ> the order of the presentation is as follows. WG members are requested to review the presentations prior to Wednesday’s meeting. 1. George Kirikos (#23): https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/93126760/URS-Proposal-23.pd... 2. George Kirikos (#32): https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/93126760/URS-Proposal-32.pd... 3. George Kirikos (#33): https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/93126760/URS-Proposal-33.pd... 4. George Kirikos and Zak Muscovitch (#34): https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/93126760/URS-Proposal-34.pd... NOTE FOR WG MEMBERS REVISING PROPOSALS: If WG members have revised/combined proposals the Co-Chairs request that they send them to the WG list as soon as possible and be ready to present them during the meeting on Friday, 12 October. Staff have updated the numberings displayed on the proposals to be consistent with the numberings on the wiki. The wiki page also includes a document that consolidates all URS proposals from individual members to facilitate viewing/reference. Per the procedure, please also note the following time requirements for the presentations: * When a proposal is up for discussion, its proponent will be accorded a maximum of five (5) minutes to orally present the proposal, rationale, and supporting evidence. * The floor will then be open to other Working Group members to comment on the proposal for a maximum of two (2) minutes each, with total discussion limited to twenty (20) minutes. However, if there is exceptionally high interest in a topic, the Co-Chairs would have discretion to increase the discussion time. * At the end of twenty (20) minutes, or when there are no more commenters in queue, the proponent will have up to four (4) minutes to respond and/or propose a modification of the proposal based upon the discussion. Depending on the actual progress during the Wednesday meeting, if a proposal cannot be presented due to time limitation, the presentation should be deferred to the meeting on 12 October. Draft Agenda: 1. Review Agenda/Statements of Interest Updates 2. Discussion of Individual URS Proposals (See: wiki<https://community.icann.org/x/aACNBQ>) 3. ICANN63 Schedule (see attached) 4. AOB Best, Mary, Ariel, Berry, and Julie On Behalf of the RPM PDP WG Co-Chairs
