The CCWG-Accountability has been pretty successful with three co-chairs. As for the balance with the Contracted Party House, I am not all that concerned with the proposal as I'm sure that many members of the RySG and RrSG will be tracking this pretty closely and this co-chair proposal was made by a registrar. Best, Jon
On Apr 12, 2016, at 10:58 AM, Phil Corwin via gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> wrote:
With all respect, Greg, my interest is in being a member of the leadership team and not in the passive Liaison role. Best, Philip
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/Cell
Twitter: @VLawDC
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 12, 2016, at 10:40 AM, Greg Shatan via gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>> wrote:
I have some concerns with this configuration in terms of balance (and related concerns about the accuracy of Volker's categorizations, on both the "formal" and de facto levels). As such I would instead suggest J. Scott and Kathy as co-chairs, with Phil remaining in the role of GNSO Liaison (the primary role to which Phil was already appointed).
Greg Shatan
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Statton Hammock via gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>> wrote: Also agree with Volker's suggestion.
Statton
Statton Hammock Vice-President, Business & Legal Affairs
Office | 425-298-2367 <tel:425-298-2367> Mobile | 425-891-9297 <tel:425-891-9297>statton@rightside.rocks <mailto:statton@rightside.rocks>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:30 AM, Gabriela Szlak via gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>> wrote: + 1 to Volker.
Gabriela Szlak
Skype: gabrielaszlak Twitter: @GabiSzlak
La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial. The information in this e-mail is confidential.
2016-04-12 10:24 GMT-03:00 Volker Greimann via gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>>: Hi all,
with the list of nominations and seconds that we have right now (and provided we will not get any last minute nominations), it looks like Phil, Scott and Kathy have the most support. While none of these candidates represent contracted parties, I do not see this as a problem, as I have great faith in the neutrality of all candidates.
With Phil formally representing business interests, Scott the IP concerns and Kathy the non commercial users, I propose we consider a triumvirate, maybe with one chair and two co/vice-chairs, with Phil as chair and Scott and Kathy as co-chairs.
Best regards,
Volker _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg>
_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg>
_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg>
<>No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/> Version: 2016.0.7497 / Virus Database: 4545/12005 - Release Date: 04/10/16
<ATT00001.c>
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg