Hi folks, There was an interesting article published today about a copyright dispute involving "white noise" videos on YouTube: https://gizmodo.com/man-s-youtube-video-of-white-noise-hit-with-five-copyri-... which linked to the dispute procedure that YouTube follows: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2797454 Going through the various links, it was very interesting that they even have a "Copyright School", see: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2814000 (expand the "How to resolve a copyright strike" to see the link to it), which is quite interesting, given how often the education aspect for registrants has come up in our PDP's work. Also of interest is the section on "Counter Notification Basics": https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2807684 where importantly it says: "After we process your counter notification by forwarding it to the claimant, the claimant has 10 business days to provide us with evidence that they have initiated a court action to keep the content down." and it's the content creator who posts the relevant jurisdiction: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6005919 ""I consent to the jurisdiction of the Federal District Court for the district in which my address is located, or if my address is outside of the United States, the judicial district in which YouTube is located, and will accept service of process from the claimant." As noted in prior threads, various issues arise under the URS (and UDRP) when the natural role of plaintiffs vs. defendants (had the URS/UDRP not existed) gets reversed (e.g. the Yoyo.email UK "cause of action issue", as well as IGO and other groups' claimed "sovereign immunity"). With the dispute resolution procedure followed by YouTube, instead the onus is on the copyright owner (the "claimant") to file the lawsuit, in the same natural way that would exist had that dispute resolution procedure not existed. Thus, none of the issues due to reversal of plaintiff/defendant arise. I thought it would be of interest, especially as it also might also give insights as to how "defaults" are handled. Food for thought. Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/