I would go with: "two years from the earlier of the day on which the essential elements (act or omission by a known person resulting in damages to the claimant) of the claim are known to the claimant and the day on which they are discoverable." as per: http://www.casselsbrock.com/Doc/Limitations_Law_in_Ontario_1464 Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Doug Isenberg <disenberg@gigalawfirm.com> wrote:
Two years from when?
Doug Isenberg www.GigaLaw.com
On July 20, 2016 1:50:04 PM George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
I don't think this was brought up before yet in the context of the PDDRP, but perhaps it can be added to the list of topics.
It would be very odd if complainants were allowed to bring a PDDRP for a matter that was not able to be brought by them in a court of law, because it was barred by the relevant statute of limitations. I think amending the PDDRP to explicitly add a time limit for bringing a PDDRP would make sense, to handle this situation. 2 years would be a suitable limit, in my opinion, and would help ensure that complaints are brought in a timely fashion.
Thoughts?
Sincerely,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg