Thanks again Mary, Two quick things: 1) While I appreciate that there may be some process question about when/where this question fits, Michael Graham’s proposal (in the attached email dated 20-Apr) seems to be missing from the “Consolidated Table of Proposed Refinements to Charter Questions…” That proposal was: “The Trademark Claims Service and TMCH registration program should be expanded to apply to all Legacy TLDs as well as New gTLDs.” Again, even if it is necessary for some process reason to discuss this at another moment, it may be worth recording this proposal in the above‑mentioned document. 2) Question 4.a. states: “What is the evidence of harm under the existing system?” This should probably be rephrased, e.g., as: “Is there evidence of harm under the existing system? If so, what evidence is there, and what types of harm are observed?” Thanks. Brian From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 10:23 PM To: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] Agenda for next RPM Working Group call this Wednesday Dear all, The proposed agenda for the next Working Group call, scheduled for this Wednesday at 1700 UTC, is as follows: 1. Roll call (via Adobe Connect or phone bridge only); updates to Statements of Interest 2. Receive and discuss final reports from the Sunrise and Trademark Claims Sub Teams 3. Confirm opening and closing dates for Open TMCH Questions poll 4. Discuss co-chairs’ proposed agenda for, and intended outcomes of, 3-hour WG session at ICANN59 5. Next steps For Agenda Item #2, the Sub Teams will be circulating their reports before the call, hopefully on Tuesday (tomorrow). For Agenda Item #3, we hope to be able to publish the poll by the time of the Working Group call, if not before. For Agenda Item #4, please see the following suggested agenda (with the chronological order TBD): 1. Further discussion of reports and suggestions from the Sunrise and Trademark Claims Sub Teams (up to one hour each) 2. Panel discussion with registry and registrar representatives (up to one hour): · For this session, the co-chairs will be sending an invitation letter to the Chairs of the Registries and Registrars Stakeholder Groups this week, inviting them to send representatives to engage in discussion with our Working Group. Working Group members who are also RySG or RrSG members will be cc’d on the correspondence, as it seems likely they will be involved in their SG discussions. · The scope of the proposed panel discussion is likely to focus on the data collection suggestions that the two Sub Teams (for Sunrise and Trademark Claims) will be proposing (and which the Working Group will have the opportunity to review and discuss this week). Thanks and cheers Mary