Wow, based on Deloitte's confirmation that those marks were *all* acceptable for inclusion in the TMCH, then it's a worse situation than even I expected. The need for reforms is clear. Is Deloitte going to produce the list of top 500 most popular TMCH claims terms, as requested? Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 3:38 PM, John McElwaine <john.mcelwaine@nelsonmullins.com> wrote:

Mary,

Would you mind sending (or resending) the design mark examples. Thanks,

John

From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 2:58 PM To: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] Deloitte responses to our follow up questions

Dear all,

Please find attached the responses from Deloitte on the additional questions we had sent to them previously. Their response follows on our discussion with them at ICANN58 in Copenhagen and includes their feedback on the various “design mark” examples we had provided.

Thanks and cheers

Mary

Confidentiality Notice

This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.

If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone (800-237-2000) or reply to this e-mail and delete all copies of this message.

_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg

Hi Mary, It may have been to *both*, actually. I believe I brought it up in Copenhagen (and maybe other times, as we were discussing questions during phone calls): See point #6 of the email at: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2017-March/001119.html where I may have first brought it up, and then I believe during the call the following day, when I tried to summarize some of that email's points for Deloitte. In any event, whoever can deliver it should do so, to inform our work. Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote:

Hi George – if I’m not mistaken, wasn’t that request made of the Analysis Group and not Deloitte? If that’s the one I’m thinking of, please know that we are liaising with the Analysis Group to confirm if they have and can share that data.

Thanks and cheers Mary

On 4/14/17, 16:01, "gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of George Kirikos" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of icann@leap.com> wrote:

Wow, based on Deloitte's confirmation that those marks were *all* acceptable for inclusion in the TMCH, then it's a worse situation than even I expected. The need for reforms is clear.

Is Deloitte going to produce the list of top 500 most popular TMCH claims terms, as requested?

Sincerely,

George Kirikos 416-588-0269 https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.leap.com_&d=DwIGaQ&c...

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 3:38 PM, John McElwaine <john.mcelwaine@nelsonmullins.com> wrote: > Mary, > > > > Would you mind sending (or resending) the design mark examples. Thanks, > > > > John > > > > From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] > On Behalf Of Mary Wong > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 2:58 PM > To: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org > Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] Deloitte responses to our follow up questions > > > > Dear all, > > > > Please find attached the responses from Deloitte on the additional questions > we had sent to them previously. Their response follows on our discussion > with them at ICANN58 in Copenhagen and includes their feedback on the > various “design mark” examples we had provided. > > > > Thanks and cheers > > Mary > > Confidentiality Notice > > This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which > it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is > proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from > disclosure. > > If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, > retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have > received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either > by phone (800-237-2000) or reply to this e-mail and delete all copies of > this message. > > > _______________________________________________ > gnso-rpm-wg mailing list > gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg