Wow, based on Deloitte's confirmation that those marks were *all* acceptable for inclusion in the TMCH, then it's a worse situation than even I expected. The need for reforms is clear. Is Deloitte going to produce the list of top 500 most popular TMCH claims terms, as requested? Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 3:38 PM, John McElwaine <john.mcelwaine@nelsonmullins.com> wrote:
Mary,
Would you mind sending (or resending) the design mark examples. Thanks,
John
From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 2:58 PM To: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] Deloitte responses to our follow up questions
Dear all,
Please find attached the responses from Deloitte on the additional questions we had sent to them previously. Their response follows on our discussion with them at ICANN58 in Copenhagen and includes their feedback on the various “design mark” examples we had provided.
Thanks and cheers
Mary
Confidentiality Notice
This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.
If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone (800-237-2000) or reply to this e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg