Action Items (initial list) from the Working Group call held earlier today (Wednesday 10 August)
Dear Working Group Members, The following is the initial list of Action Items from the call held earlier today. Staff will send the second additional list of Action Items following confirmation of specific suggested language from the call transcript and recording. Action Item #1: · Members who were on the call today approved the proposed set of follow up questions to be sent to the three TM-PDDRP Providers. Members who were not able to be on the call are kindly requested to review the attached questions and send any concerns or objections to this mailing list by Monday 15 August. We hope to send the questions out early next week, with a view to receiving the providers’ input by end-August. Action Item #2: · Members who were on the call today approved the proposed list of questions for the ICANN community survey. Members who were not able to be on the call are kindly requested to review the attached questions and send any concerns or objections to this mailing list by Monday 15 August. We hope to create the survey and send out the link by the end of next week, with a view to receiving responses by Friday 16 September. Action Item #3: · All members are invited to provide their view as to the scope of the mandate of the TMCH Sub Team. As noted on the call today, some Working Group and Sub Team members thought it would be appropriate for the Sub Team to catalogue all existing information and data they consider relevant, to be reported back to the full Working Group – this could include developing appropriate questions to be answered (based on those in the Working Group Charter and additional Working Group/community questions) and requesting materials from third parties (e.g. the TMCH Providers, registrars, others). The information sought could include not just materials that are easily accessible by public search but potentially also information that, while already in existence, will be provided by request. Other Working Group members thought that the Sub Team’s mandate was limited to gathering information and data that was already publicly available and reporting that back to the full Working Group – this would not include the Sub Team contacting third parties who may be able to provide additional data or materials. · For further background, please refer to the Sub Team’s initial report on the Working Group wiki space: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/61605051/TMCH%20Sub%20Team%.... · To join the Sub Team, please contact the GNSO Secretariat at gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> with your request to be added to the list. Action Item #4: · With thanks to those Members who have already completed the Doodle poll on mediation and burden of proof, Members who have not yet participated in the straw poll are kindly requested to do so by Friday 12 August: http://doodle.com/poll/nc8ydu8cbbywtabm. As always, the call recording and transcript as well as any follow up documents will be posted to the Working Group wiki space, under the relevant meeting date: https://community.icann.org/x/uwSsAw. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong@icann.org Telephone: +1-603-5744889
Hi, Just a follow up on the proposed Draft Survey Questions for the ICANN community (Action Item #2): As this is now a questionnaire that will be sent out to all ICANN SO/ASC & GNSO groups / constituencies, I suggest just a small change of Q 2 and 3, basically to delete the parenthesis (as it may be read by now as: “Have you or your members…” with “you” exemplified with the text in the parenthesis), from Have you (or your clients or any persons or entities that you represent) or your members considered using it? To "Have you, your clients or any persons or entities that you represent, or members of an organization you represent considered using it? and If you (or your clients or persons or entities you represent) or your members have considered filing a complaint but did not proceed, what were the reasons? To “If you, your clients or any persons or entities that you represent, or members of an organization you represent have considered filing a complaint but did not proceed, what were the reasons?” Best, Petter -- Petter Rindforth, LL M Fenix Legal KB Stureplan 4c, 4tr 114 35 Stockholm Sweden Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 E-mail: petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu www.fenixlegal.eu NOTICE This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail. Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu Thank you 10 augusti 2016 21:49:37 +02:00, skrev Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>:
Dear Working Group Members,
The following is the initial list of Action Items from the call held earlier today. Staff will send the second additional list of Action Items following confirmation of specific suggested language from the call transcript and recording.
Action Item #1: ·Members who were on the call today approved the proposed set of follow up questions to be sent to the three TM-PDDRP Providers. Members who were not able to be on the call are kindly requested to review the attached questions and send any concerns or objections to this mailing list by Monday 15 August. We hope to send the questions out early next week, with a view to receiving the providers’ input by end-August.
Action Item #2: ·Members who were on the call today approved the proposed list of questions for the ICANN community survey. Members who were not able to be on the call are kindly requested to review the attached questions and send any concerns or objections to this mailing list by Monday 15 August. We hope to create the survey and send out the link by the end of next week, with a view to receiving responses by Friday 16 September.
Action Item #3: ·All members are invited to provide their view as to the scope of the mandate of the TMCH Sub Team. As noted on the call today, some Working Group and Sub Team members thought it would be appropriate for the Sub Team to catalogue all existing information and data they consider relevant, to be reported back to the full Working Group – this could include developing appropriate questions to be answered (based on those in the Working Group Charter and additional Working Group/community questions) and requesting materials from third parties (e.g. the TMCH Providers, registrars, others). The information sought could include not just materials that are easily accessible by public search but potentially also information that, while already in existence, will be provided by request. Other Working Group members thought that the Sub Team’s mandate was limited to gathering information and data that was already publicly available and reporting that back to the full Working Group – this would not include the Sub Team contacting third parties who may be able to provide additional data or materials.
·For further background, please refer to the Sub Team’s initial report on the Working Group wiki space: <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/61605051/TMCH%20Sub%20Team%...>.
·To join the Sub Team, please contact the GNSO Secretariat at <gnso-secs@icann.org> with your request to be added to the list.
Action Item #4: ·With thanks to those Members who have already completed the Doodle poll on mediation and burden of proof, Members who have not yet participated in the straw poll are kindly requested to do so by Friday 12 August: <http://doodle.com/poll/nc8ydu8cbbywtabm>.
As always, the call recording and transcript as well as any follow up documents will be posted to the Working Group wiki space, under the relevant meeting date: <https://community.icann.org/x/uwSsAw>.
Thanks and cheers Mary
Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: mary.wong@icann.org
Telephone: +1-603-5744889
_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg>
participants (2)
-
Mary Wong -
Petter Rindforth