June 2020 - GNSO-RPMs-WG-SGB

RPM Comment Review Subgroups A & B - Remit Parameters
by Julie Hedlund June 10, 2020

June 10, 2020

Dear Sub Group A and B members, On behalf of David, Paul, and Zak, the Sub Group A and B Chairs, and on behalf of John, Kathy, and Phil, full WG Co-Chairs, please find the attached RPM Comment Review Subgroups A & B - Remit Parameters. Kind regards, Mary, Ariel, and Julie

1 0

REMINDER: Proposed Agenda -- GNSO RPMs PDP WG Sub Group B -- Thursday, 11 June 2020 at 1700 UTC
by Julie Hedlund June 10, 2020

June 10, 2020

Dear Sub Group B members, As a reminder please see below the agenda for the meeting on Thursday, 11 June at 1700 UTC. Kind regards, Mary, Ariel, and Julie From: GNSO-RPMs-WG-SGB <gnso-rpms-wg-sgb-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday, June 4, 2020 at 2:51 PM To: "gnso-rpms-wg-sgb(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpms-wg-sgb(a)icann.org> Subject: [GNSO-RPMs-WG-SGB] Proposed Agenda -- GNSO RPMs PDP WG Sub Group B -- Thursday, 11 June 2020 at 1700 UTC Dear Sub Group B members, Please find below the proposed agenda for the call on Thursday, 11 June 2020 at 1700 UTC for 90 minutes. In preparation for this meeting, Sub Group members are requested to read the comments received on URS Recommendation #4 [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…> and URS Question #2 [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…> in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16p196gjSt1CCXnowlWeXl_BcaggiXpoxiRS… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…>, or see the links in the Table of Contents [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…> in the first tab. Proposed Agenda: 1. Review Agenda/Updates to Statements of Interest 2. Wrap Up: Summary from 04 June Meeting 3. Reviewing Public Comments – See: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16p196gjSt1CCXnowlWeXl_BcaggiXpoxiRS… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…>, and go to the links in the Table of Content [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…>s on the first tab and below: * URS Recommendation #4 [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…> * URS Question #2 [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…> 4. AOB If you need a dial out or would like to submit an apology, please email gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>. Kind regards, Mary, Ariel, and Julie

1 0

Sub Group B: Public Comment Analysis Summary Document
by Ariel Liang June 8, 2020

June 8, 2020

Dear Sub Group B members, Staff have been developing a public comment analysis document to encapsulate/summarize the Sub Group’s deliberations on the public comments. We hope this document can help Sub Group B present the outcome of its work for review/consideration by the full WG. Please see the document here with a brief introduction below: https://docs.google.com/document/d/110It4ZZMV6V4XY77J6DUq-H_ZGtdPNV8qCB_5Uk… * This document is not meant to replace Sub Group B’s transcripts/recordings/chat records, which include the full details of each meeting; * In general, we hope this document can be continuously used by the full WG after Sub Group B’s deliberation is completed; * Each recommendation/question title/number is linked to the wiki page that contains the contextual language; * Under each recommendation/question, there are three sub sections: * Public Comment Referred to WG: It contains the public comments the Sub Group B decides to flag to the WG for further deliberation; link to the public comment review tool (PCRT) and corresponding row number(s) are included here; * Public Comment Deliberation Summary: It includes two sub sections – 1) Sub Group B Deliberation Summary & 2) WG Deliberation Summary; * Under “Sub Group B Deliberation Summary”, it Includes a high-level summary of the Sub Group’s response/action related to the public comments, particularly the flagged public comments that will be referred to the full WG; * Under “WG Deliberation Summary”, the content is TBD and will be populated after the WG has reviewed the flagged public comments (if any) and the Sub Group’s deliberation summary; staff expect that content under this sub section will be included in the Final Report (as part of the context/deliberation); * Proposed Final Recommendation Language: * If Sub Group B agrees the recommendation should be maintained “as is”, the original language of the preliminary recommendation will be included here for the full WG to review/consider; * If Sub Group B agrees on any edits/revisions to the recommendations, the proposed language will be included here for the full WG to review/consider; * All final recommendation language will be confirmed by the full WG. * If the discussion of certain recommendation/question has loose end, staff will flag them with highlighted text (“[not completed]”) to indicate that Sub Group B’s deliberations on them are not completed. The update of this document will be ongoing -- staff aim to update this document shortly after each meeting finishes and circulate it for Sub Group members’ review. You are welcome to provide input/feedback and point out any error/mischaracterization/missing content on list. To facilitate your review, staff can provide a brief presentation on this document during next week’s call. Thank you for your time and review. Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Ariel

1 0

Post Call / RPMs SGB / Thursday, 04 June 2020 at 17:00 UTC
by Michelle DeSmyter June 8, 2020

June 8, 2020

Dear all, All recordings for the Review of all Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) in all gTLDS Sub Group B call held on Thursday, 04 June 2020 at 17:00 UTC can be found on the agenda wiki page (<https://community.icann.org/x/6AYdC>attendance included) and the GNSO Master calendar <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group…> . These include: * Attendance (please let me know if your name has been left off the attendance list) * Audio recording * Zoom chat archive * Zoom recording (including audio, visual, rough transcript) * Transcript As a reminder only members can join the call, observers can listen to the recordings and read the transcript afterwards. Please email gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> if you would like to change your status from observer to member. For additional information, you may consult the mailing list archives <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpms-wg-sga/> and the main wiki page<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=136118869>. Thank you. Kind regards, Michelle

1 0

Proposed Agenda -- GNSO RPMs PDP WG Sub Group B -- Thursday, 11 June 2020 at 1700 UTC
by Julie Hedlund June 4, 2020

June 4, 2020

Dear Sub Group B members, Please find below the proposed agenda for the call on Thursday, 11 June 2020 at 1700 UTC for 90 minutes. In preparation for this meeting, Sub Group members are requested to read the comments received on URS Recommendation #4<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16p196gjSt1CCXnowlWeXl_BcaggiXpoxiRS…> and URS Question #2<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16p196gjSt1CCXnowlWeXl_BcaggiXpoxiRS…> in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16p196gjSt1CCXnowlWeXl_BcaggiXpoxiRS… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…>, or see the links in the Table of Contents [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…> in the first tab. Proposed Agenda: 1. Review Agenda/Updates to Statements of Interest 2. Wrap Up: Summary from 04 June Meeting 3. Reviewing Public Comments – See: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16p196gjSt1CCXnowlWeXl_BcaggiXpoxiRS… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…>, and go to the links in the Table of Content [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…>s on the first tab and below: * URS Recommendation #4<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16p196gjSt1CCXnowlWeXl_BcaggiXpoxiRS…> * URS Question #2<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16p196gjSt1CCXnowlWeXl_BcaggiXpoxiRS…> 4. AOB If you need a dial out or would like to submit an apology, please email gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>. Kind regards, Mary, Ariel, and Julie

1 0

Reminder re: RESPONSE REQUESTED: Options on URS Question #1
by Julie Hedlund June 4, 2020

June 4, 2020

Dear Sub Group B members, As a reminder please see the request below and note that responses are due by COB today, 01 June. Kind regards, Mary, Ariel, and Julie From: GNSO-RPMs-WG-SGB <gnso-rpms-wg-sgb-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 6:03 PM To: "gnso-rpms-wg-sgb(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpms-wg-sgb(a)icann.org> Subject: [GNSO-RPMs-WG-SGB] RESPONSE REQUESTED: Options on URS Question #1 Dear Sub Group B members, Per the following action item re: URS Question #1 captured from today’s RPMs PDP WG Sub Group B meeting that the Co-Chairs and staff will formulate two options for the Sub Group to consider and take them to the list, please see the following options below and indicate your preference. If you have another option to suggest please provide the text of the option. Please provide your response by COB Monday, 01 June. Thank you very much for your assistance. Kind regards, Mary, Ariel, and Julie With respect to URS Questions 1a and 1b (see below) please indicate your preference for how the Sub Group should proceed in its summary to the full WG: Option 1: The Sub Group should in its summary to the WG report that there were strong differences of opinion and a variety of responses to URS Questions 1a and 1b and the recommendation of the Sub Group is that the full WG should revisit these questions and the responses to them. Option 2: The Sub Group should in its summary to the WG report that there were strong differences of opinion and a variety of responses to URS Questions 1a and 1b, but in the absence of any high-level of agreement the WG does not need to take further action with respect to URS Question 1. URS Question #1: 1a. Should URS Rule 15(a) be amended to clarify that, where a Complaint has been updated with registration data provided to the Complainant by the URS Provider, there must be an option for the Determination to be published without the updated registration data? 1b. If so, when, by whom, and how should this option be triggered? 1c. Are there any operational considerations that will need to also be addressed in triggering this option?

2 1

RPM Subgroup “B” - Draft Remit Parameters
by Julie Hedlund June 2, 2020

June 2, 2020

Dear Sub Group members, On behalf of the Co-Chairs, Paul and Zak, please see the below proposed draft Subgroup “B” Remit Parameters. The Co-Chairs request that you review the proposed Remit Parameters prior to the call on June 4, 2020, and if you have any questions, concerns, or objections, state them on the Sub Group mailing list by the end of the day tomorrow, Wednesday, June 3, 2020, as otherwise the Co-Chairs intend to implement these Remit Parameters for our work going forward starting on our Thursday call. Kind regards, Mary, Ariel, and Julie RPM Subgroup “B” - Draft Remit Parameters The remit of SG “B” is to review the public comments and to identify; 1. if any Public Comments provided any new and material perspectives which the WG had not considered in making its initial WG Recommendation; and 1. if any WG Recommendations received widespread and substantial opposition from interests not already considered by the WG in making its initial Recommendations; If the SG finds that (a) and/or (b) exists, then the SB may determine that it should refer the subject Recommendation to the full WG for possible reconsideration of its initial Recommendation. In the absence of either (a) and/or (b), then the SG will recommend to the WG that the particular Recommendation be maintained “as is”. The Subgroup will not deliberate upon or propose any changes, revisions, or adjustments to a Recommendation in the absence of clear and substantive error.

1 0

Reminder: Proposed Agenda -- GNSO RPMs PDP WG Sub Group B -- Thursday, 04 June 2020 at 1700 UTC
by Julie Hedlund June 2, 2020

June 2, 2020

Dear Sub Group B members, Please find below the proposed agenda for the call on Thursday, 04 June 2020 at 1700 UTC for 90 minutes. In preparation for this meeting, Sub Group members are requested to read the comments received on URS Questions #1 (and the options suggested on the list), #2, and #3 – click on the tab links URS Question #1<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16p196gjSt1CCXnowlWeXl_BcaggiXpoxiRS…>, URS Rec #2 [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…>, and URS Rec #3 [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…> in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16p196gjSt1CCXnowlWeXl_BcaggiXpoxiRS… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…>, or see the links in the Table of Content [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…>s in the first tab. Proposed Agenda: 1. Review Agenda/Updates to Statements of Interest 2. Wrap Up: Action Items from 28 May Meeting: URS Question #1<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16p196gjSt1CCXnowlWeXl_BcaggiXpoxiRS…> -- Options 1 and 2 for Reporting to the WG 3. Reviewing Public Comments – See: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16p196gjSt1CCXnowlWeXl_BcaggiXpoxiRS… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…>, and go to the links in the Table of Content [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…>s on the first tab and below: * URS Rec #2 [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…> * URS Rec #3 [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_spread…> 4. AOB If you need a dial out or would like to submit an apology, please email gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>. Kind regards, Mary, Ariel, and Julie

1 0