April 12, 2017
4:22 p.m.
On 12-04-17 18:16, Maxim Alzoba wrote:
P.s: Since that ranking was based on non correct voting (name of the poll did no go well with all candidates affiliation), and the description of methodology of how ICANN staff evaluated candidates (Expertise Criteria was quantitive but not based on relevance of expertise to the item reviewed) was sent to SCC only AFTER the poll we should not see the results as like they were set in stone and we might apply our judgement and reach consensus.
Not addressing the correctness or not of the voting, I assume we are not bound by the poll in any case - any result we come up with should be OK, as long as it is approved by consensus. Julf