Hello Marika, Thank you for the confirmation. Were SO/AC leaders invited to confirm the support for candidates? P.s: I will reach out to RySG ExCom on this matter. Sincerely Yours, Maxim Alzoba Special projects manager, International Relations Department, FAITID m. +7 916 6761580 skype oldfrogger Current UTC offset: +3.00 (Moscow)
On Mar 31, 2017, at 16:04, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Correct - only the GAC has endorsed candidates to date (https://community.icann.org/m/mobile.action?dest=%23page%2F63145857 <https://community.icann.org/m/mobile.action?dest=#page/63145857>). Note that the summary document I circulated contains the GNSO affiliation that we derived from the application. We will be relying on you though to confirm with your respective groups that this is correct.
Best regards,
Marika
On Mar 31, 2017, at 06:05, Maxim Alzoba <m.alzoba@gmail.com <mailto:m.alzoba@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear Marika,
I do not see affiliation with SO/AC , just GNSO (which is too broad), also there is no information about nominations from the relevant SO/AC , ... the only applicants supported are from GAC.
Could you confirm that only GAC approved it's candidates, and SO/AC did not confirm support for candidates it via e-mail or other means?
Sincerely Yours,
Maxim Alzoba Special projects manager, International Relations Department, FAITID
m. +7 916 6761580 skype oldfrogger
Current UTC offset: +3.00 (Moscow)
On Mar 31, 2017, at 05:20, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org <mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> wrote:
Dear All,
Following on from the call today, staff has gone ahead and created two (for now) possible approaches for a survey to review the candidates for the RDS Review Team:
· Option 1 – See https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=0hjSAi4ZCoUvdD2Kv0gANdf5YVqJkYkY72BakcBodNIid_2FUGWhFFHZYmxyB7zn0K[surveymonkey.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_...> for a preview. This is a very straightforward approach which first asks two questions in relation to whether the candidate qualifies as a GNSO candidate (yes/no-don’t know) and whether the candidate has the necessary expertise and competence (yes/no-don’t know), followed by a ranking of the candidates. This approach is similar to the one used by the volunteers that reviewed the SSR2-RT candidates. · Option 2 – See https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=3yLMDGyDuJTXv7WxGEXYmZTUiaAeDz3ZMxJ6g2UuNK6V0_2FXUhfilY6EjEGBvPgJQ[surveymonkey.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_...> for a preview. This survey goes into a bit more detail as it asks to rank the candidates based on how the meet 1) the skills and expertise as outlined in the call for volunteers, and 2) the desired attributes as outlined in the call for volunteers. This option could be further refined by asking a ranking for each individual skill / expertise and/or desired attribute, but that would make the survey significantly longer and would also take you more time to complete. The aggregated score could be used to obtain an overall ranking based on the responses from all.
Note that these two options are in preview mode – any responses will not be recorded.
Please share with the list which approach has your preference and/or which modifications or alternative approaches should be added to this list of options.
Once the SSC has agreed on an approach, you will also need to decide whether you intend to share the individual survey responses with the SSC or only the aggregated results as well as whether you intend to share these publicly. As noted on the call today, the charter foresees that “To facilitate its deliberations, the SSC may decide to conduct some or all of its deliberations in private, but if so, it is expected to provide a rationale with its recommendations”.
We would like to ask you to share your feedback as soon as possible so that ideally the survey will be launched early next week to allow for review and discussion of the results during next week’s meeting (please remember to fill out the doodle poll that has been circulated by Nathalie).
Best regards,
Marika
P.S. You will also find attached the updated summary document which now includes a column for gender. <RDS RT Selection - Summary Document - updated 30 March 2017.docx> _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc>