Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT
Dear SSC members, Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm=50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4a... . Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08 To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018 Dear SSC members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B. For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4. Kind regards, Emily ACTION ITEMS Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix. Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4. Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February. NOTES: 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates - no SOI updates 2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members - GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the existing SSR-RT candidates. - Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap. - The candidates have distinct skill sets. - One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis. - Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members. - The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular. - Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment. - Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item). 3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter - Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the previous call. From the chat: Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views - Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5). - Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the Council has made a decision. - One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later. - Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation. From the chat: Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not. Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?) Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures? Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages - Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner. - Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text. 4. AOB - none Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
Hello Emily, After review I am quite fine with the Poll. God Bless Poncelet On 26 January 2018 at 05:51, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> wrote:
Dear SSC members,
Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm= 50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4aYn8s_2BehtuuSaiKM_3D&tab_clicked=1 .
Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday.
Kind regards,
Emily
*From: *Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> *Date: *Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08 *To: *"gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org> *Subject: *Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018
Dear SSC members,
Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B.
For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. *Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4. *
Kind regards,
Emily
ACTION ITEMS
Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix.
Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4.
Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February.
NOTES:
1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates
- no SOI updates
2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members
- GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the existing SSR-RT candidates.
- Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap.
- The candidates have distinct skill sets.
- One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis.
- Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members.
- The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular.
- Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment.
- Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item).
3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter
- Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the previous call.
From the chat:
Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too
Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options
Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views
- Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5).
- Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the Council has made a decision.
- One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later.
- Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation.
From the chat:
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private
Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not.
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records
Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement
Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?)
Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures?
Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages
- Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner.
- Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text.
4. AOB
- none
*Emily Barabas *| Senior Policy Specialist
*ICANN* | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 <+31%206%2084507976>
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
-- Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS Coordinator The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio MDI Road Kanifing South P. O. Box 421 Banjul The Gambia, West Africa Tel: (220) 4370240 Fax:(220) 4390793 Cell:(220) 9912508 Skype: pons_utd *www.ymca.gm <http://www.ymca.gm>http://signaraglobalsolutions.com/ <http://signaraglobalsolutions.com/>http://jokkolabs.net/en/ <http://jokkolabs.net/en/>www.waigf.org <http://www.waigf.org>www,insistglobal.com <http://www.itag.gm>www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org>http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753 <http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753>*www.diplointernetgovernance.org
Dear SSC members, It appears that Survey Monkey is now requiring users to login to use the poll in “preview” mode. I apologize for that. I don’t think this was previously the case with this mode. To ensure everyone can test the poll, I’ve gone ahead and opened it. Please use this link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5. I will clear the results before we start officially collecting votes, so feel free to submit “test” answers. Let’s extend the deadline for testing the poll. How about Tuesday 30 January at 11:00 UTC? If anyone needs more time, please just let me know. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 21:51 To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT Dear SSC members, Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm=50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4a... . Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08 To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018 Dear SSC members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B. For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4. Kind regards, Emily ACTION ITEMS Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix. Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4. Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February. NOTES: 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates - no SOI updates 2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members - GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the existing SSR-RT candidates. - Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap. - The candidates have distinct skill sets. - One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis. - Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members. - The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular. - Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment. - Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item). 3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter - Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the previous call. From the chat: Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views - Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5). - Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the Council has made a decision. - One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later. - Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation. From the chat: Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not. Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?) Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures? Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages - Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner. - Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text. 4. AOB - none Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
I have reviewed the poll and it seems very easy to insert input I am fine with it. Thanks for setting it up. On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> wrote:
Dear SSC members,
It appears that Survey Monkey is now requiring users to login to use the poll in “preview” mode. I apologize for that. I don’t think this was previously the case with this mode.
To ensure everyone can test the poll, I’ve gone ahead and opened it. Please use this link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5. I will clear the results before we start officially collecting votes, so feel free to submit “test” answers.
Let’s extend the deadline for testing the poll. How about Tuesday 30 January at 11:00 UTC? If anyone needs more time, please just let me know.
Kind regards,
Emily
*From: *Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> *Date: *Thursday 25 January 2018 at 21:51 *To: *"gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org> *Subject: *Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT
Dear SSC members,
Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm= 50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4aYn8s_2BehtuuSaiKM_3D&tab_clicked=1 .
Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday.
Kind regards,
Emily
*From: *Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> *Date: *Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08 *To: *"gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org> *Subject: *Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018
Dear SSC members,
Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B.
For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. *Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4. *
Kind regards,
Emily
ACTION ITEMS
Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix.
Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4.
Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February.
NOTES:
1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates
- no SOI updates
2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members
- GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the existing SSR-RT candidates.
- Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap.
- The candidates have distinct skill sets.
- One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis.
- Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members.
- The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular.
- Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment.
- Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item).
3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter
- Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the previous call.
From the chat:
Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too
Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options
Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views
- Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5).
- Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the Council has made a decision.
- One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later.
- Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation.
From the chat:
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private
Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not.
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records
Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement
Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?)
Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures?
Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages
- Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner.
- Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text.
4. AOB
- none
*Emily Barabas *| Senior Policy Specialist
*ICANN* | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 <+31%206%2084507976>
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
+1 On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Susan Kawaguchi <susankpolicy@gmail.com> wrote:
I have reviewed the poll and it seems very easy to insert input I am fine with it.
Thanks for setting it up.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> wrote:
Dear SSC members,
It appears that Survey Monkey is now requiring users to login to use the poll in “preview” mode. I apologize for that. I don’t think this was previously the case with this mode.
To ensure everyone can test the poll, I’ve gone ahead and opened it. Please use this link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5. I will clear the results before we start officially collecting votes, so feel free to submit “test” answers.
Let’s extend the deadline for testing the poll. How about Tuesday 30 January at 11:00 UTC? If anyone needs more time, please just let me know.
Kind regards,
Emily
From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 21:51 To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT
Dear SSC members,
Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm=50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4a... .
Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday.
Kind regards,
Emily
From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08 To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018
Dear SSC members,
Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B.
For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4.
Kind regards,
Emily
ACTION ITEMS
Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix.
Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4.
Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February.
NOTES:
1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates
- no SOI updates
2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members
- GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the existing SSR-RT candidates.
- Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap.
- The candidates have distinct skill sets.
- One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis.
- Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members.
- The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular.
- Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment.
- Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item).
3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter
- Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the previous call.
From the chat:
Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too
Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options
Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views
- Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5).
- Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the Council has made a decision.
- One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later.
- Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation.
From the chat:
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private
Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not.
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records
Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement
Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?)
Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures?
Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages
- Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner.
- Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text.
4. AOB
- none
Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist
ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
Hi, I reviewed the draft poll and looks good for me. Best, Rafik On Jan 26, 2018 11:30 AM, "Susan Kawaguchi" <susankpolicy@gmail.com> wrote: I have reviewed the poll and it seems very easy to insert input I am fine with it. Thanks for setting it up. On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> wrote:
Dear SSC members,
It appears that Survey Monkey is now requiring users to login to use the poll in “preview” mode. I apologize for that. I don’t think this was previously the case with this mode.
To ensure everyone can test the poll, I’ve gone ahead and opened it. Please use this link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5. I will clear the results before we start officially collecting votes, so feel free to submit “test” answers.
Let’s extend the deadline for testing the poll. How about Tuesday 30 January at 11:00 UTC? If anyone needs more time, please just let me know.
Kind regards,
Emily
*From: *Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> *Date: *Thursday 25 January 2018 at 21:51 *To: *"gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org> *Subject: *Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT
Dear SSC members,
Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm=50pEczALMZ80 V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4aYn8s_2BehtuuSaiKM_3D&tab_clicked=1 .
Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday.
Kind regards,
Emily
*From: *Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> *Date: *Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08 *To: *"gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org> *Subject: *Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018
Dear SSC members,
Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B.
For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. *Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4. *
Kind regards,
Emily
ACTION ITEMS
Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix.
Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4.
Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February.
NOTES:
1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates
- no SOI updates
2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members
- GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaini ng candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produce d by the existing SSR-RT candidates.
- Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap.
- The candidates have distinct skill sets.
- One possible path forward - one or two members t ake the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis.
- Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members.
- The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular.
- Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills ma trix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment.
- Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item).
3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter
- Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised ch arter based on the feedback received from SSC members and di scussion on the previous call.
From the chat:
Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too
Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options
Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views
- Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5).
- Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberation s before the Council has made a decision.
- One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later.
- Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation.
From the chat:
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private
Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward . Either we have full transparency or not.
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records
Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement
Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?)
Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notif ications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures?
Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participa nts, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages
- Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner.
- Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text.
4. AOB
- none
*Emily Barabas *| Senior Policy Specialist
*ICANN* | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 <+31%206%2084507976>
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
+1 Enviado desde mi iPhone El 27 ene. 2018, a la(s) 12:11, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> escribió: Hi, I reviewed the draft poll and looks good for me. Best, Rafik On Jan 26, 2018 11:30 AM, "Susan Kawaguchi" <susankpolicy@gmail.com<mailto:susankpolicy@gmail.com>> wrote: I have reviewed the poll and it seems very easy to insert input I am fine with it. Thanks for setting it up. On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> wrote: Dear SSC members, It appears that Survey Monkey is now requiring users to login to use the poll in “preview” mode. I apologize for that. I don’t think this was previously the case with this mode. To ensure everyone can test the poll, I’ve gone ahead and opened it. Please use this link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5. I will clear the results before we start officially collecting votes, so feel free to submit “test” answers. Let’s extend the deadline for testing the poll. How about Tuesday 30 January at 11:00 UTC? If anyone needs more time, please just let me know. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 21:51 To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>> Subject: Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT Dear SSC members, Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm=50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4a... . Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08 To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>> Subject: Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018 Dear SSC members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B. For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4. Kind regards, Emily ACTION ITEMS Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix. Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4. Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February. NOTES: 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates - no SOI updates 2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members - GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the existing SSR-RT candidates. - Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap. - The candidates have distinct skill sets. - One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis. - Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members. - The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular. - Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment. - Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item). 3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter - Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the previous call.
From the chat: Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views
- Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5). - Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the Council has made a decision. - One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later. - Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation.
From the chat: Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not. Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?) Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures? Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages
- Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner. - Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text. 4. AOB - none Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976<tel:+31%206%2084507976> _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.
Hello All, Sorry, i might have read something wrong. But on the survey i can only find two candidates (Scott and Rao) whereas on the list of candidates we have Norm Richie + the two others. Did i miss something ? Otherwise, this is very accurate. Best regards Fredric Le 29/01/2018 à 00:20, Novoa, Osvaldo a écrit :
+1
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El 27 ene. 2018, a la(s) 12:11, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> escribió:
Hi,He
I reviewed the draft poll and looks good for me.
Best,
Rafik
On Jan 26, 2018 11:30 AM, "Susan Kawaguchi" <susankpolicy@gmail.com<mailto:susankpolicy@gmail.com>> wrote: I have reviewed the poll and it seems very easy to insert input I am fine with it.
Thanks for setting it up.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> wrote: Dear SSC members,
It appears that Survey Monkey is now requiring users to login to use the poll in “preview” mode. I apologize for that. I don’t think this was previously the case with this mode.
To ensure everyone can test the poll, I’ve gone ahead and opened it. Please use this link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5. I will clear the results before we start officially collecting votes, so feel free to submit “test” answers.
Let’s extend the deadline for testing the poll. How about Tuesday 30 January at 11:00 UTC? If anyone needs more time, please just let me know.
Kind regards, Emily
From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 21:51 To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>> Subject: Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT
Dear SSC members,
Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm=50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4a... .
Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday.
Kind regards, Emily
From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08 To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>> Subject: Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018
Dear SSC members,
Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B.
For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4.
Kind regards, Emily
ACTION ITEMS Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix. Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4. Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February.
NOTES: 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates - no SOI updates
2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members - GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the existing SSR-RT candidates. - Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap. - The candidates have distinct skill sets. - One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis. - Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members. - The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular. - Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment. - Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item).
3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter - Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the previous call. From the chat: Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views
- Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5). - Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the Council has made a decision. - One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later. - Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation. From the chat: Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not. Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?) Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures? Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages
- Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner. - Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text.
4. AOB - none
Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976<tel:+31%206%2084507976>
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
________________________________
El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información
This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
-- photo <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/> <http://twitter.com/safebrands> Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> fg@safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> Skype: mailclub1 <#> www.safebrands.com <http://www.safebrands.com> Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France <https://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/> N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate.
Hi Frederic, Thanks for your question. Is this the list you are referring to: https://community.icann.org/display/GSSC/SSR2-RT ? I apologize for any confusion. I should have clarified that this wiki page was the one we set up for the previous SSR2 selection process the SSC conducted in Summer 2017. In that previous process, the SSC was considering three candidates: Rao Naveed Bin Rais, Scott McCormick, and Norm Ritchie. The SSC selected Norm Ritchie, who is currently serving on the SSR2-RT. Rao Naveed Bin Rais and Scott McCormick are the two applicants remaining in the pool of candidates, so we are only considering these two at this time. Kind regards, Emily From: Gnso-ssc <gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg@safebrands.com> Organization: SafeBrands Date: Monday 29 January 2018 at 18:09 To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ssc] Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT Hello All, Sorry, i might have read something wrong. But on the survey i can only find two candidates (Scott and Rao) whereas on the list of candidates we have Norm Richie + the two others. Did i miss something ? Otherwise, this is very accurate. Best regards Fredric Le 29/01/2018 à 00:20, Novoa, Osvaldo a écrit : +1 Enviado desde mi iPhone El 27 ene. 2018, a la(s) 12:11, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com><mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com><mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> escribió: Hi,He I reviewed the draft poll and looks good for me. Best, Rafik On Jan 26, 2018 11:30 AM, "Susan Kawaguchi" <susankpolicy@gmail.com<mailto:susankpolicy@gmail.com><mailto:susankpolicy@gmail.com><mailto:susankpolicy@gmail.com>> wrote: I have reviewed the poll and it seems very easy to insert input I am fine with it. Thanks for setting it up. On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> wrote: Dear SSC members, It appears that Survey Monkey is now requiring users to login to use the poll in “preview” mode. I apologize for that. I don’t think this was previously the case with this mode. To ensure everyone can test the poll, I’ve gone ahead and opened it. Please use this link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5[surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_DFHMTT5&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=V7imr53noY7Wa3YeaTiTF5JmtwaNoVOPEc42s63rJ-E&e=>. I will clear the results before we start officially collecting votes, so feel free to submit “test” answers. Let’s extend the deadline for testing the poll. How about Tuesday 30 January at 11:00 UTC? If anyone needs more time, please just let me know. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 21:51 To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>> Subject: Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT Dear SSC members, Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm=50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4aYn8s_2BehtuuSaiKM_3D&tab_clicked=1[surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_create_preview_-3Fsm-3D50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4aYn8s-5F2BehtuuSaiKM-5F3D-26tab-5Fclicked-3D1&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=Z3dPzBXjhfwC7NtZYkHilbyh6gK2s3RHqIRLs2FYApU&e=> . Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08 To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>> Subject: Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018 Dear SSC members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_Uge8B&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=L_Yl73ePtLMz9RwZTp1XQn21M3O9_xdtP734n-5QF1s&e=>. For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4. Kind regards, Emily ACTION ITEMS Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix. Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4. Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February. NOTES: 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates - no SOI updates 2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members - GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the existing SSR-RT candidates. - Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap. - The candidates have distinct skill sets. - One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis. - Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members. - The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular. - Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment. - Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item). 3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter - Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the previous call. From the chat: Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views - Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5). - Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the Council has made a decision. - One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later. - Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation. From the chat: Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not. Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?) Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures? Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages - Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner. - Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text. 4. AOB - none Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976<tel:+31%206%2084507976><tel:+31%206%2084507976> _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc -- [photo] [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/frames/frame_bubble_le...] [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/linkedin.png][linkedin.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fredericguillemaut_&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=RVc_XBQrXix_NZTjKNVCpxov4HWgILjIaVkqQyxn080&e=> [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/twitter.png] [twitter.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_safebrands&d...> Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/phone2.png]Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/phone2.png]France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/mobile.png]Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/email1.png]fg@safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/social.png]Skype: mailclub1 [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/website.png]www.safebrands.com [safebrands.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.safebrands.com&d=DwM...> [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/address1.png]Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/apps/linkedin_connect.png][linkedin.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fredericguillemaut_&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=-47msz3Z8Eb2lXSeT6qMf1kLR1jV3EIwHY82RL94AhM&e=> N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate.
Hi So the open poll is already the final poll and we can vote on it? What is the deadline please? And possible to postpone it for 1 week after NCPH intersessional? Thanks On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> wrote:
Hi Frederic,
Thanks for your question. Is this the list you are referring to: https://community.icann.org/display/GSSC/SSR2-RT ?
I apologize for any confusion. I should have clarified that this wiki page was the one we set up for the previous SSR2 selection process the SSC conducted in Summer 2017.
In that previous process, the SSC was considering three candidates: Rao Naveed Bin Rais, Scott McCormick, and Norm Ritchie. The SSC selected Norm Ritchie, who is currently serving on the SSR2-RT.
Rao Naveed Bin Rais and Scott McCormick are the two applicants remaining in the pool of candidates, so we are only considering these two at this time.
Kind regards,
Emily
*From: *Gnso-ssc <gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg@safebrands.com> *Organization: *SafeBrands *Date: *Monday 29 January 2018 at 18:09 *To: *"gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-ssc] Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT
Hello All,
Sorry, i might have read something wrong.
But on the survey i can only find two candidates (Scott and Rao) whereas on the list of candidates we have Norm Richie + the two others. Did i miss something ?
Otherwise, this is very accurate.
Best regards
Fredric
Le 29/01/2018 à 00:20, Novoa, Osvaldo a écrit :
+1
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El 27 ene. 2018, a la(s) 12:11, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com> <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> escribió:
Hi,He
I reviewed the draft poll and looks good for me.
Best,
Rafik
On Jan 26, 2018 11:30 AM, "Susan Kawaguchi" <susankpolicy@gmail.com<mailto:susankpolicy@gmail.com> <susankpolicy@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have reviewed the poll and it seems very easy to insert input I am fine with it.
Thanks for setting it up.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> <emily.barabas@icann.org>> wrote:
Dear SSC members,
It appears that Survey Monkey is now requiring users to login to use the poll in “preview” mode. I apologize for that. I don’t think this was previously the case with this mode.
To ensure everyone can test the poll, I’ve gone ahead and opened it. Please use this link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5[surveymonkey.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_...>. I will clear the results before we start officially collecting votes, so feel free to submit “test” answers.
Let’s extend the deadline for testing the poll. How about Tuesday 30 January at 11:00 UTC? If anyone needs more time, please just let me know.
Kind regards,
Emily
From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> <emily.barabas@icann.org>>
Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 21:51
To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> <gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> <gnso-ssc@icann.org>>
Subject: Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT
Dear SSC members,
Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm=50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4aYn8s_2BehtuuSaiKM_3D&tab_clicked=1[surveymonkey.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_cr...> .
Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday.
Kind regards,
Emily
From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> <emily.barabas@icann.org>>
Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08
To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> <gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org> <gnso-ssc@icann.org>>
Subject: Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018
Dear SSC members,
Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B[community.icann.org] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_U...>.
For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4.
Kind regards,
Emily
ACTION ITEMS
Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix.
Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4.
Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February.
NOTES:
1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates
- no SOI updates
2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members
- GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the existing SSR-RT candidates.
- Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap.
- The candidates have distinct skill sets.
- One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis.
- Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members.
- The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular.
- Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment.
- Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item).
3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter
- Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the previous call.
From the chat:
Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too
Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options
Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views
- Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5).
- Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the Council has made a decision.
- One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later.
- Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation.
From the chat:
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private
Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not.
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records
Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement
Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?)
Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures?
Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages
- Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner.
- Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text.
4. AOB
- none
Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist
ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
Email: emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> <emily.barabas@icann.org> | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 <+31%206%2084507976><tel:+31%206%2084507976> <+31%206%2084507976>
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> <Gnso-ssc@icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> <Gnso-ssc@icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> <Gnso-ssc@icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
________________________________
El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información
This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
--
[image: photo]
[image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/frames/frame_bubble_le...]
[image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/linkedin.png] [linkedin.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fred...> [image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/twitter.png] [twitter.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_safebrands&d...>
Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands
[image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/phone2.png]Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007>
[image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/phone2.png]France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022>
[image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/mobile.png]Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027>
[image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/email1.png]fg@safebrands.com
[image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/social.png]Skype: mailclub1
[image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/website.png]www.safebrands.com [safebrands.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.safebrands.com&d=DwM...>
[image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/address1.png]Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France
[image: https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/apps/linkedin_connect.png] [linkedin.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fre...>
N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate.
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
Hi Renata, Thanks for your question. For the moment, the poll is only open to test, so that you can provide feedback on the format. The deadline to suggest changes to the format is tomorrow (Tuesday 30 January) at 11:00 UTC. After that deadline, I will send another email letting everyone know that the poll is open for voting. Typically, we give a deadline of one week from the opening of the poll, so the deadline would be Tuesday 6 February. Will that allow you enough time following the NCPH Intersessional? Kind regards, Emily From: Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino@gmail.com> Date: Monday 29 January 2018 at 18:24 To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> Cc: Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg@safebrands.com>, "gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-ssc] Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT Hi So the open poll is already the final poll and we can vote on it? What is the deadline please? And possible to postpone it for 1 week after NCPH intersessional? Thanks On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> wrote: Hi Frederic, Thanks for your question. Is this the list you are referring to: https://community.icann.org/display/GSSC/SSR2-RT[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_GSSC_SSR2-2DRT&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6rf_WdO-4DR37J28tYSt7EBugt43f0NyIdEVC3Snvmc&s=UJfgGM7hYPOhbi0atPPmJI4I0zqwikUW4oa4DmFLlsA&e=> ? I apologize for any confusion. I should have clarified that this wiki page was the one we set up for the previous SSR2 selection process the SSC conducted in Summer 2017. In that previous process, the SSC was considering three candidates: Rao Naveed Bin Rais, Scott McCormick, and Norm Ritchie. The SSC selected Norm Ritchie, who is currently serving on the SSR2-RT. Rao Naveed Bin Rais and Scott McCormick are the two applicants remaining in the pool of candidates, so we are only considering these two at this time. Kind regards, Emily From: Gnso-ssc <gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg@safebrands.com<mailto:fg@safebrands.com>> Organization: SafeBrands Date: Monday 29 January 2018 at 18:09 To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ssc] Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT Hello All, Sorry, i might have read something wrong. But on the survey i can only find two candidates (Scott and Rao) whereas on the list of candidates we have Norm Richie + the two others. Did i miss something ? Otherwise, this is very accurate. Best regards Fredric Le 29/01/2018 à 00:20, Novoa, Osvaldo a écrit : +1 Enviado desde mi iPhone El 27 ene. 2018, a la(s) 12:11, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com><mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com><mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> escribió: Hi,He I reviewed the draft poll and looks good for me. Best, Rafik On Jan 26, 2018 11:30 AM, "Susan Kawaguchi" <susankpolicy@gmail.com<mailto:susankpolicy@gmail.com><mailto:susankpolicy@gmail.com><mailto:susankpolicy@gmail.com>> wrote: I have reviewed the poll and it seems very easy to insert input I am fine with it. Thanks for setting it up. On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> wrote: Dear SSC members, It appears that Survey Monkey is now requiring users to login to use the poll in “preview” mode. I apologize for that. I don’t think this was previously the case with this mode. To ensure everyone can test the poll, I’ve gone ahead and opened it. Please use this link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5[surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_DFHMTT5&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=V7imr53noY7Wa3YeaTiTF5JmtwaNoVOPEc42s63rJ-E&e=>. I will clear the results before we start officially collecting votes, so feel free to submit “test” answers. Let’s extend the deadline for testing the poll. How about Tuesday 30 January at 11:00 UTC? If anyone needs more time, please just let me know. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 21:51 To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>> Subject: Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT Dear SSC members, Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm=50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4aYn8s_2BehtuuSaiKM_3D&tab_clicked=1[surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_create_preview_-3Fsm-3D50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4aYn8s-5F2BehtuuSaiKM-5F3D-26tab-5Fclicked-3D1&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=Z3dPzBXjhfwC7NtZYkHilbyh6gK2s3RHqIRLs2FYApU&e=> . Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08 To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>> Subject: Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018 Dear SSC members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_Uge8B&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=L_Yl73ePtLMz9RwZTp1XQn21M3O9_xdtP734n-5QF1s&e=>. For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4. Kind regards, Emily ACTION ITEMS Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix. Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4. Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February. NOTES: 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates - no SOI updates 2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members - GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the existing SSR-RT candidates. - Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap. - The candidates have distinct skill sets. - One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis. - Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members. - The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular. - Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment. - Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item). 3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter - Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the previous call. From the chat: Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views - Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5). - Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the Council has made a decision. - One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later. - Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation. From the chat: Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not. Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?) Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures? Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages - Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner. - Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text. 4. AOB - none Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Email: emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976<tel:+31%206%2084507976><tel:+31%206%2084507976><tel:+31%206%2084507976> _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc -- [photo] [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/frames/frame_bubble_le...] [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/linkedin.png][linkedin.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fredericguillemaut_&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=RVc_XBQrXix_NZTjKNVCpxov4HWgILjIaVkqQyxn080&e=> [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/twitter.png] [twitter.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_safebrands&d...> Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/phone2.png]Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/phone2.png]France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/mobile.png]Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/email1.png]fg@safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/social.png]Skype: mailclub1 [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/website.png]www.safebrands.com [safebrands.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.safebrands.com&d=DwM...> [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/address1.png]Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/apps/linkedin_connect.png][linkedin.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fredericguillemaut_&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=-47msz3Z8Eb2lXSeT6qMf1kLR1jV3EIwHY82RL94AhM&e=> N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
ok, in that case , it's fine, my mistake. And the poll is fine. Frederic Le 29/01/2018 à 18:19, Emily Barabas a écrit :
Hi Frederic,
Thanks for your question. Is this the list you are referring to: https://community.icann.org/display/GSSC/SSR2-RT ?
I apologize for any confusion. I should have clarified that this wiki page was the one we set up for the previous SSR2 selection process the SSC conducted in Summer 2017.
In that previous process, the SSC was considering three candidates: Rao Naveed Bin Rais, Scott McCormick, and Norm Ritchie. The SSC selected Norm Ritchie, who is currently serving on the SSR2-RT.
Rao Naveed Bin Rais and Scott McCormick are the two applicants remaining in the pool of candidates, so we are only considering these two at this time.
Kind regards,
Emily
*From: *Gnso-ssc <gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg@safebrands.com> *Organization: *SafeBrands *Date: *Monday 29 January 2018 at 18:09 *To: *"gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-ssc] Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT
Hello All,
Sorry, i might have read something wrong.
But on the survey i can only find two candidates (Scott and Rao) whereas on the list of candidates we have Norm Richie + the two others. Did i miss something ?
Otherwise, this is very accurate.
Best regards
Fredric
Le 29/01/2018 à 00:20, Novoa, Osvaldo a écrit :
+1
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El 27 ene. 2018, a la(s) 12:11, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com><mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com><mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> escribió:
Hi,He
I reviewed the draft poll and looks good for me.
Best,
Rafik
On Jan 26, 2018 11:30 AM, "Susan Kawaguchi" <susankpolicy@gmail.com<mailto:susankpolicy@gmail.com><mailto:susankpolicy@gmail.com><mailto:susankpolicy@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have reviewed the poll and it seems very easy to insert input I am fine with it.
Thanks for setting it up.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> wrote:
Dear SSC members,
It appears that Survey Monkey is now requiring users to login to use the poll in “preview” mode. I apologize for that. I don’t think this was previously the case with this mode.
To ensure everyone can test the poll, I’ve gone ahead and opened it. Please use this link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5[surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_DFHMTT5&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=V7imr53noY7Wa3YeaTiTF5JmtwaNoVOPEc42s63rJ-E&e=>. I will clear the results before we start officially collecting votes, so feel free to submit “test” answers.
Let’s extend the deadline for testing the poll. How about Tuesday 30 January at 11:00 UTC? If anyone needs more time, please just let me know.
Kind regards,
Emily
From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>>
Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 21:51
To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>>
Subject: Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT
Dear SSC members,
Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a preview of the draft poll here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm=50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4aYn8s_2BehtuuSaiKM_3D&tab_clicked=1[surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_create_preview_-3Fsm-3D50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4aYn8s-5F2BehtuuSaiKM-5F3D-26tab-5Fclicked-3D1&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=Z3dPzBXjhfwC7NtZYkHilbyh6gK2s3RHqIRLs2FYApU&e=>.
Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll on Monday.
Kind regards,
Emily
From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>>
Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08
To: "gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>" <gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>>
Subject: Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018
Dear SSC members,
Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our meeting today. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_Uge8B&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=L_Yl73ePtLMz9RwZTp1XQn21M3O9_xdtP734n-5QF1s&e=>.
For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the Transparency section on page 4.
Kind regards,
Emily
ACTION ITEMS
Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the attached skills matrix.
Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the Transparency section on page 4.
Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next meeting, planned for the second week of February.
NOTES:
1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates
- no SOI updates
2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills produced by existing SSR2-RT members
- GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the existing SSR-RT candidates.
- Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not appear to be any category that is an obvious gap.
- The candidates have distinct skill sets.
- One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group reviews and refines this analysis.
- Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members.
- The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that this poll is less granular.
- Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not yet a selection assignment.
- Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item).
3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter
- Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on the previous call.
From the chat:
Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too
Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared reasoning and options
Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views
- Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5).
- Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the Council has made a decision.
- One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this information later.
- Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendation.
From the chat:
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list only private
Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward. Either we have full transparency or not.
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records
Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement
Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok
Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?)
Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further measures?
Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants, it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper disclaimer section of such messages
- Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is notifying candidates in a timely manner.
- Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the SSC to candidates with disclaimer text.
4. AOB
- none
Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist
ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
Email: emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>| Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976<tel:+31%206%2084507976><tel:+31%206%2084507976>
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
________________________________
El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información
This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
--
photo
https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/frames/frame_bubble_le...
Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands
https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/phone2.pngD... : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007>
https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/phone2.pngF... : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022>
https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/mobile.pngM... : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027>
https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/email1.pngf... <mailto:fg@safebrands.com>
https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/social.pngS...: mailclub1
https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/website.png... [safebrands.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.safebrands.com&d=DwM...>
https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/address1.pngPôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France
N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate.
-- photo <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/> <http://twitter.com/safebrands> Frédéric Guillemaut Directeur Associé, SafeBrands Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007> France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022> Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027> fg@safebrands.com <mailto:fg@safebrands.com> Skype: mailclub1 <#> www.safebrands.com <http://www.safebrands.com> Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France <https://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/> N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate.
participants (7)
-
Emily Barabas -
Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands -
Novoa, Osvaldo -
Poncelet Ileleji -
Rafik Dammak -
Renata Aquino Ribeiro -
Susan Kawaguchi