Dear Working Group members, Please find below the proposed agenda for the next meeting scheduled to take place on Tuesday, 11 July at 16:00 UTC. đď¸ Outstanding Action Items đď¸ 1. Working Group to review updated text for questions f5, and g3, g4, and g5 in advance of next meeting on Tuesday, 11 July. See: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zBYIaFTF5bRrUdhnGiftP5CGHvuOoHqKPOhGnU46... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1zBYIaFTF5bRrU...> andhttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1I2DNZLxCKfmoSyffCiUL7lot3V3Zk96X5Q3ea1rE... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1I2DNZLxCKfmoS...> Kind regards, Emily, Julie, Berry, and Caitlin -- Transfer Policy Review - Meeting #96 Proposed Agenda 11 July 2023 1. Welcome and Chair updates 2. Discussion of Charter Question i1 ICANN-Approved Transfer (Bulk Transfers): i1) In light of these challenges described in section 3.1.7.2 of the Final Issue Report<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/final-issu...>, should the required fee in Section I.B.2 of the Transfer Policy<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/transfer-policy-2016-06-01-en> be revisited or removed in certain circumstances? 1. Overview of numbers related to ICANN-approved Bulk Transfers from 2018 â 2022 2. Questions for consideration based on initial reactions from Working Group * The $50,000 fee is a requirement from BTAPPAs that existed in a pre-New gTLD world? Accordingly, what fee considerations (if any) should be made now that bulk transfers could involve multiple TLDs? * Are there instances where the $50,000 fee(s) should be waived? (Examples could include involuntary bulk transfer arising from involuntary bulk transfer resulting from RAA terminations). * Should tiered fees depending on volume be considered in ICANN-approved bulk transfers? * Should additional carve-outs be considered for involuntary transfers - for example - premium names? 3. AOB