2024-04-02 Transfer Policy Review PDP WG Call Follow- Up
Dear TPR WG members, Please find below the brief notes and action items from yesterday’s meeting. The next meeting will take place on Tuesday 9 April 2024 at 16:00 UTC. Kind regards, Christian, Caitlin, Berry, Julie and Feodora 2024-04-02 Transfer Policy Review PDP WG Call<https://community.icann.org/display/TPRPDP/2024-04-02+Transfer+Policy+Review...> 1. Welcome and Chair Updates * Attendees were reminded to complete the CORD Recommendations Worksheet:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_lZLOmNQJKqAsAqxHTv8W5TQeRIm58YvS4vCPIwE... * Input on Group 1(b) recommendations is due on Tuesday, 9 April. * Chair opend the floor for questions: * Questions were raised regarding the impact of opting out from notifications, considering security risks or reduction of spam. * Operational issues for registrants and the rationale behind switching from confirmation to notification were discussed, emphasizing the need for clarity. 2. Preview Group 1(b) Recommendations Impact Chart * CORD Impact Analysis doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15h3nZhNboNnQHVnOuib33YNvKe7rnHYShFIevyzu... * The support staff team, along with Roger, assessed the impact of the recommendations, specifically for Group 1(b) CORD recommendations. * Differences between proposed policy recommendations and current requirements in the transfer policy were highlighted. * The importance of providing rationale for significant policy changes was emphasized to aid the working group in solidifying its recommendations. * Attendees were informed that the document is subject to change and encouraged to contribute. * The need for accompanying rationale for high-impact changes was stressed. * Suggestions were made to adjust the coloring and assessment for neutrality and to include notes about changes driven by other policy or regulatory factors. 3. Continued Discussion of Recommendation 17(a) (Established Customer) * Discussion continued from the previous meeting, addressing concerns raised by WG members regarding Recommendation 17(a). * Attendees explored ideas or approaches that would not pose security concerns. Suggestions included clarifying the text, specifying criteria for established customers, and defining registrar obligations. * Attendees deliberated on the duration of the established customer period and the need for additional rationale to explain implementation and enforcement. * The importance of solid rationale and the likelihood of receiving comments without full context were emphasized. 4. Updates made as a result of last week's discussion * Not discussed. 5. Any Other Business (AOB) * Not discussed. Feodora Hamza Policy Development Support Manager (GNSO) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Mobile: +32 496 30 24 15 Email: feodora.hamza@icann.org<mailto:feodora.hamza@icann.org> Website: www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>
participants (1)
-
Feodora Hamza