http://www.iana.org/assignments/registrar-ids/registrar-ids.xhtml Does that explanation helps? -- Francisco. -----Original Message----- From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br> Date: Friday, April 4, 2014 3:39 AM To: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at> Cc: "gtld-tech@icann.org" <gtld-tech@icann.org> Subject: Re: [gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs
It seems the 9998 ID is newer than that, proposed by one back-end registry in order to ease up differentiating non-billable names like NIC, WWW, WHOIS from other registry-owned names.
Rubens
Em 03/04/2014, à(s) 16:07:000, Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at> escreveu:
Maybe that post from 2013 helps? At least, ICANN clarified you can use the 9997 ID for the ICANN required monitoring registrar:
http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/2013-November/000174.html
However, it doesn't say anything about the 9998 ID...
Alex
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: gtld-tech-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gtld-tech-bounces@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Rubens Kuhl Gesendet: Donnerstag, 03. April 2014 20:05 An: gtld-tech@icann.org Betreff: [gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs
Hi there.
After seeing Francisco Arias's presentation during ICANN Singapore, I had a doubt that one person also asked during the session: if the agreement only specifies 9999 as Registrar ID, can we divide the registrations depending on its billable nature between 9998 and 9999 without breaking the agreement ? Agreement text says: "02 iana-id For cases where the registry operator acts as registrar (i.e., without the use of an ICANN accredited registrar) 9999 should be used, otherwise the sponsoring Registrar IANA id should be used as specified in http://www.iana.org/assignments/registrar-ids "
Any thoughts on that ? Any ICANN clarifications on this ?
Tks, Rubens NIC.br