Hi Amy, Thanks for generating this draft report. However, I suggest that we limit the text to "The missed service level agreement was satisfactorily explained and not an indication of a persistent issue." In my view, the CSC shall investigate and report on issues from an "overview" perspective. We look for systemic problems, not specific issues with specific customers. Therefore our reports ought not to delve into the details and specifics of single missed SLAs. This missed SLA was satisfactorily explained in the PTI report, and that's good enough. Anyone with interest in the details can easily find them in the equally public report from the PTI. Copying the details into our report makes a total non-event stand out like something that warrants attention from the reader, which I think is not the case. What do you all think? Am I on the right track here? Cheers, /Liman icann-csc@icann.org 2021-06-15 02:44 [+0000]:
All,
Attached is a draft May CSC report for review and discussion. The draft is a redline against the April CSC report.
Regards,
Amy Creamer Director of Operations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: amy.creamer@iana.org<mailto:amy.creamer@iana.org> Phone: +1-424-537-8917