Dear Friends, I have some questions about the ICANN73 planning that I would like to share with you: The plenary proposed Session "Moving Forward with the Global Public Interest Framework": by reading the summary of this session I can hardly find the difference between this session and the "The Global Public Interest at ICANN - An Update <https://72.schedule.icann.org/meetings/y99Xbhof3BbxfCQhY#/?limit=10&sortByFields[0]=isPinned&sortByFields[1]=lastActivityAt&sortByOrders[0]=-1&sortByOrders[1]=-1&uid=ir3eFeyEWMcBcKcyR>" session held during the ICANN72 . I'm personally with the proposal to go forward and discuss the application of the GPI Framework on some specific issues, such use cases will give us the necessary expertise in applying GPI Framework. Note that the SSAD and SubPro cases were slightly treated during the ICANN72 session. In another hand I wonder if the schedule <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wANaaNHUD2hBwTRvaykjIZQoAPd-zw4OCcjb...> presented during the last call, should take in account the Middle east space <https://icannwiki.org/ICANN_ME_SPACE> session, it happen that this session mostly animated by ALAC members is in conflicts with others ALAC session (for example during ICANN66 conflict with ALAC board session ) , so I suggest that the ALAC schedule take in account this cross community interaction session and avoid any conflicts with ,specifically with the Joint AFRALO-AfrICANN Meeting since both sessions generally attract same attendees from africa and middle east regions . Finally, with the hope that I am still on time ,I will iterate my session proposal about the ICANN Open Data platform <https://opendata.icann.org/pages/home-page/> use and evolution, it could be labeled under capacity building training label or outreaching/Engagement Label. Happy New Year Chokri