Jean-Jacques, Colleagues: We will need to come to operating agreements related to online process. Specific dates were set for comment. Proposals were made for the change and seconded by the only people who bothered to comment. Requests of reaction to the proposal were made which generated no reply beyond similar reaffirmation. What is our online consensus process if not taking into account comments made? If those who do not agree don't comment I'm not sure how that is to be intuited or factored. There is no humming or "thumbs up" online and I cautioned that silence would be interpreted s assent and still no comments. This needs to be an active and participative group. How would you propose achieving consensus on new proposals/amendments? Joe On 7/24/2014 9:54 AM, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote:
Hello Joe,
the reason I have not "reconfirmed" is that, as a representative of the ALAC, I cannot agree to the fact that the decision taken in London (3 Co-Chairs) has been modified in several iterations (one Chair, one Chair + Alternate(s), Chair and sub-Chairs...) without full consensus. There is no point in replying to a subsidiary question, such as my candidacy, before questions of principle have been properly dealt with (as things stand today, heavy representation of one citizenship and of business -in various guises- in the Coordination Group, content of our current draft Charter, the "technical" nature of the exercise to be dealt with only or chiefly by the "technical" and business entities, image that an unbalanced Group would give to the global Internet community, the risk that this may contribute to a misrepresentation of the true motivation of the USG, etc).
Because of their non-anecdotal nature, I have referred these points to the ALAC, and am awaiting instructions.
Best regards, Jean-Jacques.
----- Mail original ----- De: "joseph alhadeff" <joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com> À: internal-cg@icann.org Envoyé: Jeudi 24 Juillet 2014 13:51:22 Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Fwd: Co-chairs revised draft 2.0
Colleagues - as we March to Noon UTC, I wanted to provide and update on volunteers and one more look at the proposed final paper (attached for your reference).
To date the following information exists on our volunteers and their positions of interest:
Alissa Cooper – Chair
Keith Drazek – Alternate
Patrik Faltstrom – Alternate
Russ Housley – reconfirmed interest, but position not specified
Jean-Jacques Subrenat – has not reconfirmed.
Best,
Joe
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg