Re: [Internal-cg] Early draft for a charter

On 15.07.14 20:53 , WUKnoben wrote:

I think the group has to be clear about the various consensus levels everybody has in mind when talking about "consensus". In addition it should be transparent on whose behalf CG members speak and - if at all - participate in consensus calls. It could be helpful to mention it in the charter.

This is a hard problem in general. In our specific case I would go for the pragmatic approach: "No outspoken disagreement by anyone NTIA cannot ignore." This is easy to check if we liaise closely with NTIA. Daniel