Thanks James .. noted .. Kind Regards --Manal -----Original Message----- From: James M. Bladel [mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 9:37 AM To: Manal Ismail Cc: Subrenat, Jean-Jacques; mnuduma; internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until23Oct14 .. You can probably just say "ICANN" rather than "The ICANN." But I'm guessing that's just an artifact from previous edits. Thank you, J. ____________ James Bladel GoDaddy
On Oct 27, 2014, at 4:35 PM, Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Thanks Milton, Mary and Jean-Jacques for your feedback ..
Milton, it seems that Elise was suggesting the same thing, and it was my fault going back to a very early draft .. So allow me to confirm the final text here before reflecting the changes in the file:
"The ICANN is represented on the ICG by two liaisons (from the Board and the IANA Department). Both liaisons are there to provide information about the IANA functions and to keep the Board and the ICG informed about the implications of the transition."
Would this be acceptable to everyone?
Kind Regards --Manal
-----Original Message----- From: Subrenat, Jean-Jacques [mailto:jjs@dyalog.net] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2014 9:23 PM To: mnuduma Cc: internal-cg@icann.org; Milton L Mueller; Joseph Alhadeff; paf@frobbit.se; elise gerich; Manal Ismail Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 23Oct14 ..
Dear Manal,
like Joe, I prefer the sober but accurate formulation you proposed. Thanks.
Jean-Jacques.
----- Mail original ----- De: "mnuduma" <mnuduma@yahoo.com> À: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller@syr.edu>, "Joseph Alhadeff" <joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com>, paf@frobbit.se, "elise gerich" <elise.gerich@icann.org>, manal@tra.gov.eg Cc: internal-cg@icann.org Envoyé: Dimanche 26 Octobre 2014 19:34:02 Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 23Oct14 ..
+1. Mary Uduma
Sent from Samsung Mobile
-------- Original message -------- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> Date: 27/10/2014 01:06 (GMT+09:00) To: Joseph Alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com>,paf@frobbit.se,elise.gerich@icann.org,manal@tra.gov.eg Cc: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 23Oct14 ..
I think the best way to say this - simplest and most accurate - is just to delete the word board and say "ICANN is represented on the ICG by two liaisons...." Making a distinction between the board and a IANA liaison is pointless detail that may confuse ordinary readers more than it clarifies.
-----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg- bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Alhadeff Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 2:30 PM To: paf@frobbit.se; elise.gerich@icann.org; manal@tra.gov.eg Cc: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 23Oct14 ..
We really don't need any more detail than that...
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
-----Original Message-----
From: Manal Ismail [manal@tra.gov.eg] Received: Saturday, 25 Oct 2014, 2:24PM To: Patrik Fältström [paf@frobbit.se]; Elise Gerich [elise.gerich@icann.org] CC: internal-cg@icann.org [internal-cg@icann.org] Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 23Oct14 ..
Thanks Elise, Hartmut and Patrik ..
I had the same understanding too and have reflected this in earlier versions .. Yet I changed the text based on the latest draft shared by Jandyr on behalf of the small drafting group (himself, Lynn & Xiaodong), which I recall was also supported by Jean-Jacques and Milton ..
But I see your point and am happy to revert back to the earlier text, which stated:
"The Board is represented on the ICG by one liaison. In addition, there is a liaison to the ICG from the IANA Department. Both liaisons are there to provide information about the IANA functions and to keep the Board and ICG informed about the implications of the transition."
Is this ok? Should I also add the names ?
Kind Regards
--Manal
From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:paf@frobbit.se] Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 6:06 PM To: Elise Gerich Cc: Manal Ismail; internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 23Oct14 ..
I support this.
Patrik
On 25 okt 2014, at 17:13, Elise Gerich <elise.gerich@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Manal,
I thought the discussion on list had indicated that it is more accurate to say, ICANN is represented on the ICG by two liaisons rather than The Board is represented on the ICG by two liaisons. Kuo-Wei Wu is the Boards liaison to the ICG, and my role is a liaison from the ICANNs IANA department. My participation on the committee is not as a representative of the ICANN Board.
Best regards,
-- Elise
From: Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg <mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg>
Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 at 11:48 PM To: "internal-cg@icann.org <mailto:internal-cg@icann.org> " <internal-cg@icann.org <mailto:internal-cg@icann.org> > Subject: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 23Oct14 ..
Dear all ..
Please find attached, and in Dropbox, a new version of ICG FAQ reflecting the latest views and comments shared .. I have also attached below the final compilation of answers to Q#15 & Q#16 for your convenience .. Kindly note that I took the liberty to change "ICG proposal" or "ICG's proposal" to "proposal submitted by the ICG", to avoid being misunderstood as attributing the community's proposal solely to the ICG .. Hope this is ok with everyone ..
Happy to receive any further remarks or comments ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
----------------------------------------------------------
15. What is the role of the ICANN Board in preparing the proposal?
The ICG is independent of the ICANN Board. The Board is represented on the ICG by two liaisons (Mrs. Elise Gerich, IANA Staff Expert; and Mr. Kuo-Wei Wu, ICANN Board Liaison), who are there to provide information about the IANA functions and to keep the Board and the ICG informed about the implications of the transition. Like any other member of the community, the ICANN Board can submit comments through the established procedures for public comment. Consistent with U.S. federal government procurement rules, the NTIA needs to have the final proposal submitted to it by the ICANN Board, but the Board does not have community approval to modify the proposal submitted by the ICG. When the ICG submits the final proposal to ICANN, it will also be released to the general public and to NTIA as well.
16. How will ICANN Board handle the final proposal submitted by the ICG?
The ICG expects that the final proposal, having achieved consensus on the Coordination Group and within the Operational Communities, will be welcomed by the ICANN Board and dutifully transmitted to NTIA.
------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg