On 19 jan 2015, at 12:48, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net> wrote:
On 15.01.15 14:36 , Patrik Fältström wrote:
All,
The session is scheduled for Monday, 9 February - 10:15-13:00.
I suggest it be divided as follows:
10:15-10:20
Patrik Fältström - moderator for the whole session Introduction to the structure of the session
10:20-11:00
Operational Community 1
11:00-11:40
Operational Community 2
11:40-12:20
Operational Community 3
12:20-13:00
Representatives from ICG + Operational Communities on stage, open microphone
ICG will for this slot have three people on stage. The rest of ICG will be on the floor and have "priority" at microphones if they want to speak. I will as moderator for the session announce this, and ask ICG members "to stand up" to show who are ICG members.
Microphones will be two queues (again) but the two queues should be beside each other. One for "new items" and one for "same item".
I am thinking of a third microphone just for ICG members -- if you think that would be preferred.
I will be moderating, so I need three people from ICG to be on stage for the third portion. Alternatively, we have no ICG members on the stage, but a separate microphone for ICG.
Feedback please!
My 2cts:
ICG Chairs (present) on stage, no ICG members. If we can agree, we might have a rapporteur for each proposal clearly identified and they might be on stage and speak to "their" proposal.
Different moderator. ICG chairs should be free to speak for the ICG. Moderator is a different role.
No special microphones for ICG. For us it is about receiving first and transmitting second.
Good thinking. I like this. When you say "we might have a rapporteur for each proposal", you mean three ICG members for the last 25% of this? Others? Patrik