Comments, short ones :), inline below .. Kind Regards --Manal -----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Karrenberg Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 9:52 AM To: Alissa Cooper Cc: ICG Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Building on Commonalities .. [was: Handling process complaints] On 2.02.15 23:00 , Alissa Cooper wrote:
Jean-Jacques,
... And I think it would be great to continue this discussion on the mailing list so that it need not occupy much time during the F2F meeting. ...
After the discussion so far, my proposal remains as is: avoid any impression that we run a complaints procedure or an appeals process. [MI]: Agree .. No procedure. [MI]: Agree .. We don't necessarily need a procedure, per se, but at least we need common agreement on how to proceed .. No acknowledgements. No forwarding. [MI]: Let me try to go down this path, then what? Do nothing? Then why did we agree to receive comments directly from the community at the first place? Do something else? Fair enough, what is it? Agree on posing specific questions using our normal process. [MI]: I fully agree .. Each ICG member can pose questions to the relevant OC .. and I support Alissa's proposal, to gather all ICG questions and compile one list (union of all) for each relevant OC .. ICG questions and public comments are different and not mutually exclusive processes, as ICG questions may or may not have to with public comments .. It appears to me that we should address this first. It makes no sense going into details about a specific procedure before we definitely agree to have one. [MI]: Definitely .. I fully agree .. [MI]: I think, by now, both our views are clear :) .. Let's hear other colleagues then try to reach an ICG consensus view and a way forward tomorrow at the meeting .. Daniel _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg