On 9/3/14, 1:10 PM, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
I do not know what we are dealing here
I was commenting on v5 circulated by Wolf-Ulrich. That version has text in it that I find problematic, as indicated in my email. The v4 version you circulated does not contain that language. As I will not be present on Sept 6, I’m trying to get my comments to the mailing list in advance of the meeting. Alissa
Please kindly read my doc on consensus building sent to you last night Vrsion 4
2014-09-03 10:28 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>:
Wolf-Ulrich,
Thanks for your work on this.
On 9/2/14, 1:19 AM, "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> wrote:
* “small minority”: should further be discussed. I added the condition that a recommendation is not reached if at least one of the ICG communities (according to the list) as a whole is firmly and formally opposed. That would mean a formal written objection by the community leadership on behalf of their community.
I’m not sure this matches what was being discussed on the list. If we use the text Martin had suggested, I think the third bullet under section 4(b) should read:
"After enough time has passed for the ICG to consider and attempt to accommodate objections, the ICG can reach a conclusion if at most a small minority disagrees and their objections have been documented. It is not expected that the representatives of an operational community significantly and directly affected by a conclusion would be overruled in this process.”
Alissa
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg