I do not really know how to call the slot where groups are able to report back where they are in their coordination work. I think the general feeling in this group is that a) anyone can present, while b) ensure we get reports from each one of the three main groups. I think we later on, if we get too many requests, must prioritise. I am sure we will be able to do so, but, we need to today do a wording that makes people understand what we might do. I.e. not allow anyone to speak, because we simply can not. Comments are appreciated. This is also available in Dropbox. On 4 Aug 2014, at 19:13, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
* Session title;
Discussion with the ICG
* Brief session overview (extensive session overview and agenda details can be provided closer to the date)
The IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG) will at the ICANN51 meeting in Los Angeles have a discussion with the community on various aspects of the transition. The schedule for the session is as follows: - 15 min update from ICG - 5 min update from each one of the groups that make themselves known to the ICG, are coordinating their activities, and intend to send in material to the ICG (max 30 minutes all together) - 45 minutes open microphone where issues are brought up from individuals on the floor and/or remote participants
* Number of attendees ( e.g. 150, 300, 500+)
500+
* Date, time and duration (From Alice: "based on our experience, I suggest holding the session on Wednesday as this timeframe will allow communities to hold discussions in their respective meetings prior to the session")
Wednesday or Thursday Patrik