Colleagues I suggest that we have reviewers for each proposal that include technical savvy and less technical oriented reviewers - to make sure that technical nuances may be appropriately considered? The next two weeks are tight but I can volunteer where needed. May I suggest that we need to spread out across all the submissions... Names seems to have the greatest gravitational attraction for obvious reasons... Joe On 1/6/2015 6:45 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
Narelle,
That there is some amount of reading to do is probably a feature in all proposals, at least if they point to existing mechanisms described elsewhere or describe new mechanisms with a reasonable level of detail.
No one said the ICG job was going to be easy :-) And while I’d probably classify our task more in the category of ensuring the proposals fulfil the criteria and can fit to the rest of the system than determining if they are satisfactory to us, in any case there will be some reading and proposal-understanding ahead all of us. Unless the rest of you already understand everything, I certainly do not...
If there’s anything that the IETF team can do to help provide information or explain wrt our arrangements, let us know.
Jari
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg