Yes, it is essential that we report back to the broader community, and solicit feedback. While I am sure we will each be doing this within our own narrower consituencies, I for one would appreciate the opportunity to hear from across the community, and outside of our normal community (e.g. I am particularly interested in the views of ccTLDs who are not members of the ccNSO) So I would go for a 90 minute session, and have no more than 20 minutes of formal presentation, since we don't have terribly much yet to put on the table. Cheers Keith On 1/08/2014 10:46 a.m., Alissa Cooper wrote:
I know you’re all getting tired of emails from me, but I have a question (well, a few questions) …
Should the ICG host a public session at ICANN 51, to provide a status update and hear from the community? (My answer: yes.)
How long should the session be? 90 minutes?
I’m asking now because we need to start working with the ICANN 51 agenda folks if we want to make it happen.
Thanks, Alissa
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg