This text is good. Again: I hope that the comment *mechanism* can be set up as a generic one and kept open until our work is done. Daniel On 5.08.14 23:30 , Alissa Cooper wrote:
Ok, I made a couple of edits to the proposed landing page text to accommodate suggestions received. I slightly softened the language around community comments being our preferred mechanism and added a new final paragraph to address Paul’s and Mohamed’s points. We can keep tweaking this, but I’d like for ICANN to start getting it up on a web page in the meantime. New text:
===
ICG Charter Open for Public Comments
On July 18, the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG) produced a draft charter <link> that defines its own tasks. The charter is open for public comment until August XX, 2014 at 20:00 UTC. <bold>It is the strong preference of the ICG that comments about the charter from the public be submitted via existing IANA-related community processes, and not through the link provided below.</bold> If you need assistance finding those processes or contacting the appropriate ICG participant, please contact <secretariat-email>. If you are not able to provide comments through a relevant community or ICG participant, a mechanism for submitting comments via an email alias is linked below.
Please be aware that the ICG views defining the broad outlines of its charter as important, but it views finalizing the charter and moving on to the real work of the transition planning to be of equal importance. As a result not all comments submitted concerning the charter will necessarily be incorporated.
Public comments are considered to be for the public record, and for the information and consideration of all participants in this process, not just for the ICG. Everyone is encouraged to review any public comments that may be submitted via the process below.
Public comment submission process links:
Comment submission: <link> List of comments submitted via this site: <link> Charter: <link> Deadline: August XX, 2014 at 20:00 UTC
===
Alissa
On 8/5/14, 11:47 AM, "Paul Wilson" <pwilson@apnic.net> wrote:
I agree with Daniel’s proposal here.
Can we state that public comments are considered to be for the public record, and for the information and consideration of all participants in this process, not just for the ICG. This is reasonable I think, along with the emphasis on contributions via the relevant communities.
Paul.
On 5 Aug 2014, at 1:30 am, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
I agree that we should set up a mechanism for comments from the general public with the following properties:
It clearly, bluntly, repeatedly and unavoidably states that the preferred method for participation is via the relevant communities. Maybe we should have a check box where people have to acknowledge that they understand this before they can post a comment. ;-)
All comments should be stored in a public archive for all to see, including for us. Comments in this archive should be kept available for all to see for at least 5 years after they are made.
Discussion should be strongly discouraged in this mechanism. There are other places for that already; the most appropriate are the relevant communities.
We can then see all these comments and take them into account as appropriate.
- ----
Comments for the charter should be treated as just a special case of the above. 14 calendar days is about the right time for this as this is about the time we would need to get substantive comments from our communities and I do not see that final agreement on the charter will substantially delay our other current work.
Daniel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
iQIVAwUBU9+nINDY5Emqa716AQLdBQ//SiFPTNCCn69DUAeN44Q0zrUdzwnw924H JIGV5mNTO2BaHrwdgdJOm1D7PZUIHkyOPZ56OorvXWyQDgZy0bM7jA/P0IuHAfXL CtSGI2+o5jqmN/er00JaS1M7XvjD+1ELC0OkG5zmUY8PD1W+yOGreJ0P2e6y/T7A 9SQr1aaGCASlPrCRFTZ3yggSBzkIh1/atlcZk84tnYf04hnTmjuX3w8eJIt9kixp qzRZj8qOTyRW8fbQNYD9BeiMiqpcha4uaU27/gK0Xa91LtQoVGFY5sRceRcBHp4C XiqlH1QQa2vN2AXvQJ3uAVJep/CCUCBRl+i/rfAcjTA7TWegNL6PEidTbatJzGO4 NC36/UDflT99KcGM7F8i/UBDcIiiv56vjbzRez7id7VRQMVxn58pLusKVDYHkkQc JDVgo3IB9HETfUqRr3gFQYA9Wx7gklF0ssbZuoz70534r2CQzEtqGOlqC/6OJzjx u4PsUhHPlnkzJk+P1k3o0eC6TqrRTzpGwblDiiq5/bGCDmNXBXZW9NXTWewwbB9q ZxuP6K0BNiM1pKLXkHlTw3IQNVtIFKodIjHnp/b0vcGtGYEz7gBu4lHhJHbzks9/ SUNpeIRcPeVUD92+G75MDDNDlli/+sFu89pOrv0l8x6y0KOikILLpknlY9+BlHZC WmXf5z9aPHg= =1pee -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg