Thank you Alissa, I also think this is a reasonable process. And, I particularly like Daniel's suggestion below. As an IAB appointee to the ICG, I followed very carefully the process followed by the IETF, participating in associated Working Group/review processes. I have had no involvement with the proposals of the names or number communities beyond reading publicly available documents. Best regards, Lynn On Jan 7, 2015, at 3:31 AM, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net> wrote:
This makes sense to me.
I suggest that before we start the reviews each of us sends a message to this list describing their involvement, if any, in the development of proposals. This way all that is on record and we avoid accusations of hidden interests or actions.
For myself I can state that I have had no involvement with the proposals of the names and protocol parameters communities.
As a member of the RIPE community I have participated in the public discussion about the principles for the numbers proposal. As part of my job at the RIPE NCC I have provided advice to management about the development of the proposal. I have also worked actively within the RIR communities to explain the process and the work of the ICG.
Daniel _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg