Paul, The excel visualization of the timeline is very helpful. It really puts things in perspective. Thanks for putting that together. One of the revisions you have made to the timeline document says, ³Comments from IANA and NTIA are strongly desired.² My role as a committee member representing the IANA functions operator will provide the opportunity to share thoughts from the IANA functions operator on the strawman proposal as the committee compiles it. Do you think it is necessary to call out a request for comments from the IANA functions operator given the committee has a representative from the functions on it? Thanks, -- Elise From: Paul Wilson <pwilson@apnic.net> Date: Sunday, July 20, 2014 at 8:08 PM To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Cc: Coordination Group <internal-cg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Timeline
Thanks Russ.
As the comments show, we¹re in a hard place with the schedule, and I think the only solution is a lot flexibility, and parallelising work as much as possible.
Clearly all participants will have a hard time with the schedules, but all need to make a very best effort to move the work along, and I would prefer to challenge everyone at this early stage, while being flexible about target deadlines as they come up (and, about late submissions). We need to express clearly that we are coordinating not policing, and we will join the community in taking account of the reality of the situation.
Let¹s talk of targets rather than deadlines, and best-efforts to meet them.
The more I think about it, I think document management like what was used in NetMundial would be very very useful to the process, so I wonder if Hartmut can help to get access to that system?
Here is a suggested revision of the timeline document.
Also attached is an Excel view of the timeline, which may be useful to develop further.
Paul.