Sure. I'm assuming the transition panel would be the most appropriate time and I am slotted to be on that panel as are a couple of other members I believe... Sent from my iPad
On Aug 4, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
Ok, it seems we have lots of support for doing a public session at ICANN 51. Alice has explained to me that session requests are due August 8 at 18:00 UTC. A session request consists of the following:
* Session title; * Brief session overview (extensive session overview and agenda details can be provided closer to the date) * Number of attendees ( e.g. 150, 300, 500+) * Date, time and duration (From Alice: "based on our experience, I suggest holding the session on Wednesday as this timeframe will allow communities to hold discussions in their respective meetings prior to the session")
Patrik, since people seemed to like your proposal, can I ask you to put together these details and get it back to the group and Alice before the deadline?
Joe, can we give you an action item to start figuring out how/when a statement from the ICG might be read at the IGF and what it might contain?
Thanks, Alissa
On 8/2/14, 10:27 AM, "Manal Ismail" <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Thanks Alissa for the initiative and the suggestion .. Yes for a public session at ICANN 51 .. and yes for 90 min. .. Agree with Paul and others on maximizing the time for community engagement, Agree with Patrik's suggestion on how to manage the time of the session, and Agree with Joseph's suggestion regarding a "status update or brief statement of position to be read at or distributed for the IANA transition panel at IGF" ..
Kind Regards --Manal
-----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Lynn St.Amour Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 3:57 PM To: WUKnoben Cc: ICG Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Public session at ICANN 51?
Agree and also think we need 90 mins. in total - 30 for pres. and 60 for community engagement.
Lynn
On Aug 1, 2014, at 4:17 AM, WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> wrote:
Patrik,
as usual, you are far more structured in thinking ahead...
I fully agree on how you see a public session, inparticular the exchange with the other "interested groups". So definitely I see here a need for 90 mins.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Patrik Fältström Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 7:34 AM To: Jari Arkko Cc: ICG Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Public session at ICANN 51?
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg