Add to question 15, after the 1st sentence: Our goal is for the operational community proposals to be received by January 15, 2015, and for the transition to be complete by September 30, 2015.
-----Original Message----- From: Manal Ismail [mailto:manal@tra.gov.eg] Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 5:16 PM To: Alissa Cooper Cc: Narelle Clark; Kavouss Arasteh; Milton L Mueller; ICG Subject: RE: FAQ - deadline for comments
Thanks Alissa ..
Dear All ..
Please find attached, and in Dropbox, version 3, clean and in track changes .. In the clean version, I have: - accepted edits by Narelle, all extremely helpful, which I believe have also addressed some of the comments received - deleted comments I felt have been addressed - deleted questions 8 & 9, for the time being, following the below exchange - modified question 7 to read "Does IANA carry out functions other than names, number & protocol identifiers?" and would appreciate help in listing IANA functions not under NTIA contact - in addition to Q7, I believe there are unaddressed comments on Q12 & Q18
Looking forward to receiving your comments by 23:59 UTC on October 7 ..
Kind Regards --Manal
-----Original Message----- From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa@cooperw.in] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 6:52 PM To: Manal Ismail Cc: Narelle Clark; Kavouss Arasteh; Milton L Mueller; ICG Subject: FAQ - deadline for comments
All,
So that we can get a draft, living version of the FAQ posted to the web site prior to ICANN 51, we need to give Manal a little time to compile outstanding comments and create a clean version. Comments sent to the list about the FAQ prior to 23:59 UTC on October 7 will be incorporated into the initial version we publish on the web. Of course we will continue discussion and refinement of the FAQ after that, but if you want your edits incorporated into the initial version that we publish, please send them in before the deadline.
Thanks, Alissa
On Oct 5, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Thanks for the responses .. I believe we have agreed to have a version out before LA, right? If yes, then maybe we should set a cutoff date for comments, after which we should compile an agreed version to be posted online, and continue discussing any remaining 'relevant' questions ..
Views received so far, which I personally share and Narelle showed flexibility, are in favour of deleting Q9 ..
As for Q7, I personally agree to deleting it, but allow me to propose a middle ground .. It may be changed to read "Does IANA carry out functions other than names, number & protocol identifiers?", although the answer may be the same, it would be stating facts rather than predicting outcome of the process .. thoughts?
Q8 is one of the questions that were listed for the session held at the IGF, but I agree to its deletion ..
Waiting for further comments before compiling a new version ..
Kind Regards --Manal
-----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Narelle Clark Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 2:56 AM To: Kavouss Arasteh; Milton L Mueller Cc: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ ..
-----Original Message----- From: Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 3 October 2014 5:01 AM
I agree with Milton in regard with IANA INVOKING POWER .However, I would like to know whether the replacement of NTIA ,if any, would have the same or would excercise the same power?
Like I said, I am not wed to the inclusion of the question re invocation of power. As they say, I was merely flying a kite as it is a question I have been frequently receiving.
To the latter question, that surely is up to the communities to propose and decide.
And a good question, indeed.
In regard with his second comment, I am not sure that we should limit
ourselcves to say about who were are; what we do; how to respond to our RFP; the respective roles of the ICG, operational communities, USG; how people can get involved in any of those activities. I do not see any problem if we could provide information on IANA, the
IANA transition, and ICANN accountability
I agree they are questions people need and want answers to. Whether we should be the ones to provide them is subject to how much time we have as it can be a long diversion...
The risk is that it dilutes our credibility as impartial coordinators of the community finding its own answers.
Best regards
Narelle
--
Narelle Clark Director of Operations - Deputy CEO Australian Communications Consumer Action Network
Suite 4.02 Level 4 55 Mountain St Ultimo NSW 2007 Australia
Follow us on twitter @ACCAN_AU Sign up for our weekly WebNews Visit our website
---------------------------------------------
The information contained in or attached to this message is intended only for the people it is addressed to. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this information is unauthorised and prohibited. This information may be confidential or subject to legal privilege. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail and any attachments. The Australian Communications Consumer Action Network does not warrant that the information in this e-mail or any attachments are free from any viruses, defects, errors, interception or interference.
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg