Paul: I have several small concerns, but I am _very_ worried about one sentence. I want to raise that first. Maybe that resolution will sort my smaller concerns too. I am troubled by the statement, “Where possible and appropriate,distinct alternative options should be identified”. I don't want the ICG discussing alternatives. I am certain that we do not want the ICG accepting or rejecting alternatives. Maybe I am misunderstanding your intent. Russ On Jul 25, 2014, at 12:03 AM, Paul Wilson wrote:
Thanks to comments from a few of you, here’s a further draft of the RFP.
My feeling is that a very structured approach is needed, and I hope that we can gather all the needed information in this way. From the IP addressing community, I think we could provide a detailed and complete response in this format, but other will need to be able to do so too.
I hope this is useful.
Paul.
<Proposal Requirements v5.docx>