Milton: I still think we need to address the ability of stakeholders to directly comment to us in the development or on the unitary proposal. That is factual. I'm also don't think that my language changes the charter as only operational communities submit proposals... joe On 8/26/2014 9:16 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
Joe
I think this is too complicated and too big a deviation from our earlier approach.
I still think the solution to JJ's concerns is to be found in the notion of the operational communities as convenors of proposal development processes that must include other interested parties.
I think all we need to do is alter the following sentence in the way I suggest below:
Original sentence:
The IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG) seeks /complete formal responses/ to this RFP from the "operational communities" of IANA (i.e., those with direct operational or service relationships with IANA, in connection with names, numbers, or protocol parameters).
Proposed modification:
The IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG) requests "operational communities" of IANA (i.e., those with direct operational or service relationships with IANA, in connection with names, numbers, or protocol parameters) to convene processes to develop /complete formal responses/ to this RFP.
This is a simpler change, does not alter the basic assumptions of our charter, but also makes it clear that the operational communities are responsible for convening processes that, according to other language that is already in the RFP,
Proposals are expected to enjoy a broad consensus of support from all interested parties. During the development of their proposals, the operational communities are requested to consult and work with other affected parties. Likewise, in order to help the ICG maintain its light coordination role, all other affected parties are strongly encouraged to participate in community processes.
...
Communities are asked to adhere to open and inclusive processes in developing their responses.... Etc.
Milton L Mueller
Laura J and L. Douglas Meredith Professor
Syracuse University School of Information Studies
http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/
*From:*internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *joseph alhadeff *Sent:* Tuesday, August 26, 2014 9:01 AM *To:* internal-cg@icann.org *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] RFP subgroup
So here's a shot at compromise text...
On 8/26/2014 8:43 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
I want to be on it.
Milton L Mueller
Laura J and L. Douglas Meredith Professor
Syracuse University School of Information Studies
http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg@icann.org <mailto:Internal-cg@icann.org>