On 11 aug 2014, at 23:33, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net> wrote:
On 11.08.14 22:30 , Alissa Cooper wrote:
... Also, it would be helpful to know if ICG participants would generally prefer to try to meet in spaces that can accommodate public observers in the future.
Our work is not parliamentary. Therefore I believe remote observation is sufficient. We do not need to make an extra effort to meet in huge halls.
I support this view. It is so extremely important our work is accessible for everyone so translation, remote observers, recordings etc are so extremely much more important than "large halls". I.e. I rather use space in the rooms we spend time in for us and whatever technology is needed to make remote observers experience as good as possible. Patrik