Agree .. That's why I was asking whether the ICG should bring to the attention of the CWG-Stewardship the way forward regarding the IANA trademark and domain name, as per the protocol parameters and the numbers proposals .. Kind Regards --Manal -----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Karrenberg Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 2:28 PM To: joseph alhadeff; internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Step 2 assessment On 18.02.15 16:23 , joseph alhadeff wrote:
Agree with the path forward, and would also suggest that we keep the Names community apprised of our progress on related work as things they may wish to consider in the development of their proposal.
Exactly! Daniel _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg