Dec. 16, 2014
12:56 p.m.
Very much agree with Jari here:
-----Original Message----- I would go right ahead and have open community discussion on the things that I think are relevant for moving forward after Singapore, which I think include also things like overlaps, missing pieces, and compatibility of the different proposals (where they need to be compatible).
As for this:
And general feedback from the community.
One question to consider is whether this becomes a public comment session in which groups strive to alter the proposals. We would need to be clear about the fact that ICG cannot re-design proposals and if we uncover any serious problems the proposals will simply be sent back to the OCs.