On 1 aug 2014, at 03:27, jari.arkko@piuha.net wrote:
We should have a session.
I think 60 minutes is enough for the CG part.
But I'm wondering if there should also be "this is what is happening at IETF (etc)"? Or is it too early? Maybe not, we know the process and it is ongoing even if the result is not there yet...
We have I think three possible contents for an ICG session: 1. ICG present where we are, what we will do next. 2. Feedback from community to ICG (including Q&A), i.e. "open mike" 3. "Invitation" to other groups to come and present what is happening (IETF, RIRs, GNSO, ccNSO etc) To some degree I think we need all three. It is VERY important we do not loose anyone, so taking for granted the community know where we are is dangerous. Specifically given the "misunderstandings" I see on various mailing lists. So 1 is important. I also think 2 is important. I.e. "why not"? 3 might also be important to cross feed information from these groups to the community (not so much to ICG). Proposal: 1: 15 min 3: 10 min for each group that want to present 2: Whatever is left of 90 minutes Patrik