Hi Jean-Jacques, I have a couple of questions below. On 7/14/14, 12:18 PM, "jjs" <jjs@dyalog.net> wrote:
Hello Alissa,
you called for volunteers within our Coordination Group to flesh out our draft agenda, and volunteer to lead the corresponding discussions.
Throughout the Transition exercise, proposing viable processes and structures will be of prime importance.
Viable processes and structures for what? I’m unclear on what you are referring to here.
Understandably, our draft agenda for London does not identify this as a separate challenge. But I think it must shape all of our work right from the start. I would therefore suggest that on Day 2, from 11:45 to 12:45, we include a discussion on possible types of framework and process, as a replacement for the oversight currently exercised by the USG.
Again I’m unclear on what you mean by “types of framework and process.” Could you elaborate? In the thread about the proposed CG charter, there have been a few messages indicating support for the idea that the bulk of the substance of the transition proposal be developed in the separate communities of interest, following those communities’ processes. So I’m interested to learn more about what you mean by types of process to replace the current USG oversight. Thanks, Alissa
Our point of departure must be the 4 criteria laid out by the USG for a transition to be accepted .
I'd be prepared to introduce the subject and lead the discussion.
Best regards, Jean-Jacques.
Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> a écrit :
I am re-sending the link to the agenda (in .txt and .pdf format) in case new folks have joined this list over the weekend:
https://www.alissacooper.com/files/iana/
If you are willing to lead any of the agenda sessions, and particularly if you’re willing to contribute a proposal for any of the sessions and use that to structure the discussion, please make that known on the list or by replying to me directly. I have started reaching out to some of you individually about leading various sessions and will continue to do so if we don’t have enough volunteers.
Best, Alissa
On 7/11/14, 4:11 PM, "Alissa Cooper" <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
I have updated the agenda (attached) based on our call yesterday. Note that Day 2 now concludes at 5pm rather than 4:30pm.
For a few of the sessions I put “(IETF)” or “(IAB)” in parentheses where I know we are working on proposals and may be able to lead those sessions. If you are willing to lead any of the agenda sessions, and particularly if you’re willing to contribute a proposal for any of the sessions and use that to structure the discussion, please make that known on the list or by replying to me directly. I will probably reach out to some of you individually about leading various sessions if we don’t have enough volunteers.
It would probably be good to publish at least a rough agenda publicly on our various mailing lists prior to the meeting so that people watching remotely can follow along. Let’s aim to do that by, say, 20:00 UTC.
And please keep the comments/suggestions coming on the agenda.
Alissa
On 7/9/14, 2:04 AM, "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> wrote:
Thanks Alice and Alissa for preparing the meeting. I'm one of the GNSO appointees and loaded with more than 30 years of experience from the telco sector. My former employer was Deutsche Telekom, and I'm now working for eco, the German internet business association.
Easy for me to be in London on time. Looking forward to meet you all there
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Alissa Cooper Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 12:19 AM To: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: [Internal-cg] Proposed agenda for July 17-18
Hi all,
Looking forward to working with you on this important effort. I think I know most of you, but for those who I do not: I’m Alissa Cooper, one of the IETF appointees. I work for Cisco on collaboration technologies (voice, WebEx, video conferencing). I’m currently one of the IETF’s 15 area directors. I’m based in California.
I’ve attached a proposed agenda for the July 17-18 meeting, developed in discussion with some IETF/IAB colleagues. This is very much a draft so it would be great to get discussion going with comments/edits/criticisms. Since the group will be somewhat large (~30 people), I made each slot a bit on the long side.
Best, Alissa
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg