I am taking a step back on this one. I think it would be best if this step were taken by someone other than me or Jari. Russ On Jan 6, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
Thank you, Jari.
It would be great if we could get some volunteers to conduct Step I of the finalization process <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/iana-transition-assembly-finaliz...> for this proposal, say within the next 2 weeks. Please respond to the list if you’re willing to conduct this assessment.
Thanks, Alissa
On Jan 6, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:
Dear all,
As you know, the IETF has been working on the protocol parameters aspects of the transition. We created the IANAPLAN working group, developed a proposed response, and held community discussions. And of course, there has been a lot of past evolution in this space as well.
This part of the process is coming to an end from our side. Our steering group, the IESG, approved the proposed response on December 18, and after some minor editorial changes, the document has been formally approved today, January 6.
The link to our proposal is below, and we look forward to working with the ICG and other communities on the next steps. We are committed to ensuring a good outcome for the Internet in this topic.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-09
Jari Arkko
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg