Manal, Please see http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/2015-January/001592.html. I believe that is our answer until we meet and discuss. Alissa On Jan 31, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
I fully agree to Daniel's suggestion .. I also noticed the following on the CWG mailing list:
" thanks for the CWG timeline. Is the ICG likely to adjust its own timeline due to the delay incurred by our process? I note that at the moment, the Names Community proposal is set to reach the ICG as the very end of its process "ICG develops Final Response"."
Kind Regards --Manal -----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Karrenberg Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2015 11:30 AM To: Alissa Cooper; ICG Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Fwd: CWG Timetable - Best Case Estimate (RESEND with updated attachment)
So the cat is finally out of the bag officially :-(.
I suggest that we, the ICG, should take a positive attitude and that we genuinely thank the CWG for their response and their work so far. We need to work actively in order to emphasise the progress already achieved by *all* OCs. We also need to admit that our original time-line was extremely ambitious and possibly unrealistic given the complexities in the "names" OC. We have to do everything to counter the impression that the process has failed or is failing because we are going to miss an extremely ambitious target for delivery of our proposal.
Daniel
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg